This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{ portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{ WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Software: Computing Stub‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles Stub This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

This page may need one of those "reads like an ad" warning boxes. It is borderline. Also, for any library with market competition, I like to see a link to a comparison chart, or at least a comparison or criticism section.

XEP was PROD tagged for "no indication of WP:notability. No independent WP:reliable sources." However, it is a product of RenderX, which appears to be a viable article about a notable company (and which already mentions the product in RenderX#Products). Therefore, could merge the product into that section and set a redirect. DMacks ( talk) 06:16, 24 June 2013 (UTC) reply

• Merge lack of sources / notability (currently). Widefox; talk 12:37, 29 January 2014 (UTC) reply