![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm going to try to add some material over the next several weeks. Then, after its all there, I'm going to come back and try to reorganize and improve the encyclopedic language. My plan would be to begin with some material on the nature of property, which I think is fundamental to an understanding of the regulatory taking issue. Then I've begun some material on the evolution of US constitutional law on takings. Likely, there will be lawyers or law students out there who may disagree with the selection of materials, but its a start. If you can improve the analysis, please help.
Then I'm going to try to walk through the series of key cases in the 20th century on takings showing how they relate to the regulatory takings issue. Finally, a discussion of the most recent cases.
If you have thoughts on a different approach, post here. If you have contributions to any of these topics, go for it. I'll be back from time to time to make additions. As this happens, by the way, there may be some temporary duplications, for which I apologize.
Jvonkorff ( talk) 12:06, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
This seems to be an agruement for a particular view of the takings clause not a nutal aticle. I assume that Jvonkoroff will remidy this, but I will be back for a look later. 70.150.94.194 ( talk) 20:30, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
This article reads like an American students thesis. Far too much detail, and far too Americanised. So much so that the language suggests all readers are American! —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
124.197.15.138 (
talk) 04:54, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
It reads more like a syllabus of an American law school course in regulatory takings. 24.47.228.216 ( talk) 12:30, 21 January 2013 (UTC) kolef88 24.47.228.216 ( talk) 12:30, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
It seems that this page has been focused exclusively on regulatory takings in the United States for about a decade. It would seem wise to just move the page under the name Regulatory Takings in the United States or something similar. Does anyone disagree with this? Muttnick ( talk) 17:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)