Rasul Mir was nominated as a Language and literature good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 5, 2021). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi wikipideans! I have add some templates for Rasul Mir Shahabadi. The main source of information added on this page is from the monograph on Rasul Mir by prof. G.R Malik. The book is published by Sahitya Akademi in 1990. I have recently moved to Wikipedia editing and am still learning. As you may find it well on some of my edits. In a humble supplication, I urge Wikipedia Project to help this page provide more means of comprehensive information.
Regards Musadiq Mushtaq ( talk) 06:10, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Modussiccandi ( talk · contribs) 21:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
I will review this article. I'll start posting comments on here later today.
Modussiccandi (
talk) 21:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
After reading through the article several times, I'm afraid I'll have to close this review as a "Quick Fail". This outcome is reached when a nominee is a long way removed from meeting any of the Good Article criteria. Below are the two criteria which I believe this article won't meet unless substantially re-written:
For this criterion to be met, readers must be able to verify the content of the article from reliable sources. We therefore need inline sources for all major claims in the article. Personally, I aim to have roughly one inline citation per fact presented. I will give a brief overview of the sourcing situation for the article's sections:
This criterion specifies that the article be written in an encyclopaedic and neutral tone. As it is, there are too many places where this is not the case:
Thank you for submitting this article to GAN. Although it does not meet the criteria at this time, there is nothing to prevent it from being rewritten and perhaps resubmitted at a later date. I would start by making sure that every single claim made in the article is supported by a reliable source. You would also do well to force yourself to write from a neutral point of few, which is an essential skill to have when editing Wikipedia. Please have a look at Wikipedia:Good article criteria if you're unsure about the criteria. Modussiccandi ( talk) 21:54, 5 March 2021 (UTC)