This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I've changed the article to show that "du" is equivalent to "thou," not "you." It is erroneous to think that "you" would be familiar- at this time, "you" was the respectful term in English, paralleling the continental custom of addressing superiors with the second-person plural. Thus, the Quakers made a point of addressing each other as "thou," not "you," for the same reason as the German pietists. In contemporary everyday English, "you" eventually supplanted "thou" completely, because no one wanted to appear disrespectful of anyone by addressing him as "thou." TheEvilPanda ( talk) 21:22, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Radical Pietism. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:59, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
That there were some radicals among the pietists does not warrant their separation into a separate page. A very similar movement, the Anabaptist movement, does not have a similar page. I suspect this page for radical pietists has been set up for the sake of putting distance between someone's group and the more radical elements in their heritage. This article should be integrated into the main article on Pietism. That said, prominent Brethren historian Carl Bowman does use the term. [1] Ciacg ( talk) 04:39, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
References