This article is within the scope of WikiProject Snooker, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
snooker on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SnookerWikipedia:WikiProject SnookerTemplate:WikiProject SnookerSnooker articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the
BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the
project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the
BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Armbrust - do you have any worries if I was to clean this article a bit and take it through GA? I think it's pretty close and just needs a little bit of work. What do you think?Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs) 12:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)reply
No. It would be great if the article would become GA.
ArmbrustTheHomunculus 15:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)reply
I plan on reviewing this article for possible GA status, will try to complete it in a timely manner.
Shearonink (
talk) 14:04, 31 August 2021 (UTC)reply
No
Quick fail issues. Will start getting at the rest of the review shortly.
Shearonink (
talk) 14:04, 31 August 2021 (UTC)reply
I'll try to find the topic we had open at
WP:SNOOKER, but we generally consider it to be reliable. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs) 19:30, 31 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Same with "UKGameShows.com". Also, this website is showing up on my browser as Not Secure.
The state of the website isn't fantastic, but it has an editorial team, which suggests reliability to me. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs) 19:36, 31 August 2021 (UTC)reply
I am still concerned that the site is showing up as Not Secure.
Shearonink (
talk) 07:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)reply
I don't get the same error on either mobile or desktop? If you want, we can simply list the archive-url and put the regular URL as unsuitable? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs) 16:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Yes, please, that would be fine. I just get security notices like that on the browser I use, not that I think there is a huge problem with the site but I think an archive-url would be best. Keep any possible WP-readers "safe" :). I'll wait for that change, I think that's the last on-hold thingy, will give the article a last read-through to make sure but I think it's looking like a GA. Thanks,
Shearonink (
talk) 19:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Is the Bulgarian website/source necessary? (And is it reliable...)
Shearonink (
talk) 19:20, 31 August 2021 (UTC)reply
That's the Bulgarian Snooker Federation. Most likely reliable, but whether or not it needs to be there is another question. Seems fine to help show the winners list. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs) 19:33, 31 August 2021 (UTC)reply
See previous - the NOR looks fine but for GA purposes I think the reliability of some of the sources needs to be delineated.
Shearonink (
talk) 19:20, 31 August 2021 (UTC)reply
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Yes, dispassionate in tone, doesn't favor any particular participant or have bias against participants, etc.
Shearonink (
talk) 14:43, 31 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
Very stable, no edit wars.
Shearonink (
talk) 14:43, 31 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Was Pot Black the first televised snooker programme to employ cameras in the pockets? And if, so when was this? Thanks.
Martinevans123 (
talk) 19:31, 28 April 2022 (UTC)reply