GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Seabuckthorn (
talk ·
contribs) 23:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator:
Crowz
RSA
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly.
--
Seabuckthorn
♥ 23:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
Check for
WP:LEAD:
|
![]() Check for
WP:LAYOUT:
|
![]() Check for
WP:WTW:
Check for
WP:MOSFICT:
|
![]()
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
![]() Check for
WP:RS:
|
![]() Check for inline citations
WP:MINREF:
|
![]()
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a.
Major aspects:
![]() |
---|
![]()
|
b.
Focused:
![]() |
---|
![]()
|
4: Neutral
![]() 4. Fair representation without bias:
|
5: Stable: No
edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (NFC with a valid FUR)
Images:
![]() |
---|
![]() 6: Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid fair use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
6: Images are provided if possible and are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions:
|
As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA (minor issues – Januray typo & "Prior to going working with , the Ramones' had … " something missing
). The prose quality in particular is meticulous and engrossing. Thanks, CrowzRSA, very much for your conscientious contributions.
Promoting the article to GA status.
--
Seabuckthorn
♥ 23:40, 27 February 2014 (UTC)