This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Article needs solid overview of current theories for referencing first section - perhaps Alan Soble, who I can't seem to access, or someone similar
Jacobisq (
talk) 10:57, 16 October 2012 (UTC)reply
PS Is Popper really a philosopher of love?!! News to me, but maybe.... 11:03, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Eastern Philosophies
We seem to have a lot of Western philosophies here. Are there no Eastern philosophies of love?
Tbeasley0504 (
talk) 22:53, 28 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Oh, wait. It is here. It's small though. We need to add more information.
Tbeasley0504 (
talk) 00:13, 29 December 2012 (UTC)reply
There are a lot of Hindu theologian-philosophers, as well as scriptures and religious poetry, that talk about love, both love of God / Krishna / Bakhti, as well
as marital love or affairs - they have whole shastras about it, which could be considered 'philosophy' if Aquinus is....
Nathanielfirst (
talk) 22:09, 18 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Not part of main love article?
This seems liked a subset of the main
Love article with some text copied from (or to?) it directly... should this be embedded in that, or fleshed out more fully? I am no subject expert of course. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Snarfa (
talk •
contribs) 20:26, 28 February 2013 (UTC)reply
wrong person?
Jean-Pierre Rousselot in the list of ppl doesn't seem like he had anything to do with love, instead he was into languages... instead I think the link should be Pierre Rousselot, a different person who wrote "The Problem of Love in the Middle Ages: A Historical Contribution"
Nathanielfirst (
talk) 17:14, 14 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Wiki Education assignment: Adult Development Spring 2023
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 April 2023 and 17 July 2023. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Smerblah,
Rjgoodwin (
article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by
Rjgoodwin (
talk) 20:39, 22 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Formatting of this article
This article seems to be written in an essay format, but it should be written in an informational formatting instead. It is not meant to convince people of a certain ideology. I'm going to work on rewording what is already written in my sandbox, and won't move it over to this page unless it is evaluated by others. I will add a link to my sandbox edits here once I begin working on this.
Smerblah (
talk) 15:43, 7 June 2023 (UTC)reply