From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
I am beginning GA review. Please feel free to leave comments regarding the review below.
Vicenarian (
talk) 05:35, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
reply
GA Review Result = PASS
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- Well-written, I made a few minor grammatical edits.
- B.
MoS compliance:
- Complies with MoS, though includes plenty of wrestling jargon - all linked to help the uninformed.
- Is it factually accurate and
verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- A wide variety of sources that are reliable in appearance.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Good use of citations, all in appropriate places.
- C.
No original research:
- None is apparent.
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- A good treatment of the team, no belt left unturned.
- B. Focused:
- Sticks to the team.
- Is it
neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- No POV issues.
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Not edited since nomination.
- Does it contain
images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales:
- Images noted as free.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
suitable captions:
- I wouldn't mind a few more images of the team in action, but the images illustrate the subjects and are appropriately captioned.
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- PASS Well done!
Vicenarian (
talk) 13:27, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
reply