This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
This page has archives. Sections older than 150 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Would it make sense to include something like:
A closed standard, on the other hand, is a file format, protocol or program which has wide public acceptance, but which does not comply with the requirements for a free/libre or open standard. Examples include file formats or protocols whose specifications are not publicly available, software whose source code is not available, and patent-encumbered technologies. Closed standards are typically developed by private companies with limited public or even industry participation.
Then, redirect closed standard to Open standard? - K ( talk) 01:12, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
It's probably a typo, but can someone restore the following sentence to whatever the consensus on this article thinks it should say. The second half of it does not seem to have any discernible meaning at the moment. -- Nigelj ( talk) 08:31, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Oasis-Open allows committees to operate either on a RAND basis or a royalty-free basis, but OASIS does say to grant "open standards" when they are not royalty-free.
I am trying to find a website that will confirm my identity. Anyone know of a good one? Travismittleider ( talk) 19:56, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
There's a duplicate entry for TCP on examples section. My unregistered IP can't edit it. Someone please do it when you see this or spot the mistake. 201.14.160.156 ( talk) 06:12, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
I'm a little curious at the fact that a programming language which has exactly one full (and non-portable) implementation is listed among the open standards for programming languages while ECMAScript (one of the most obvious choices, I would think, as it is the scripting language of the web) isn't. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.146.225.228 ( talk) 22:00, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Open standard. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 11:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
"The model started to shift, however, in 2006 and since the XML standard Microsoft has been earning a better reputation within the open-source and open-standards community"
That sentence does not specify whether "XML standard" refers to ISO-26300 or ISO-29500 or both. As such, it is highly ambiguous, and potentially misleading.
As for the claim that Microsoft earned a better reputation with either, please "view history" of this talk; also http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=20051216153153504 .
198.102.62.250 ( talk) 17:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
It is unclear to me if we should include the Matrix protocol here. I could be wrong I think it is more like an open source product than an interface standard as it is portrayed here. I am thinking we should remove the entry for now and talk about it here. But I am not an expert at the Matrix solution and haven't worked with it so I would cede to someone with more knowledge. Alex Jackl ( talk) 14:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)