This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Peerage and Baronetage / Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). London Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hi ALoan, I'm not sure I agree with moving this page. We don't normally use people's title in page titles, and it looks a bit odd having the name first, and then "Baron Annan" which is never used (he was referred to as Lord Annan). I'm inclined to move it back. What do you think? SlimVirgin ^(talk) 01:29, 20 December 2005 (UTC) reply

No answer, so I moved it back. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 20:21, 24 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Sorry - only just spotted this from the references at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(biographies) (I have not been watching this page). I think the MOS mandates that peers should generally appear under their peerage title. However, if you feel strongly against, I will not stand in your way. -- ALoan (Talk) 14:36, 28 January 2006 (UTC) reply