This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This redirect has been
automatically rated by a
bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This redirect is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
state highways and other major
roads in the
United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Is there an accepted method for trying to list relatively minor historical changes to the route of the highway? Somewhere in the middle of the 20th century the route of Rt12 changed fairly substantially through both Keene, NH and Walpole, NH (and probably others). It's not clear to me if that belongs on this page, should have a page of its own or just isn't appropriate.
I don't currently have the tools to provide an overlay of the current path through Keene on this map but as an example, here is a link to both the 1935 and 1958 USGS maps of the Keene area:
Much of the current Rt 12/Rt 9 path doesn't exist at all in this map, both highways were re-routed around the center of the city at some point (early 60's I believe) and I'd like to try and get some of that information into either this page or the appropriate place.
Okay. My initial thought was that what I had in mind to add was too detailed to be appropriate at the level of this article but perhaps it's best to lay it out and then look to break it down later it it seems warranted...
Dan Reagan (
talk)
15:18, 22 March 2010 (UTC)reply