![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This article is quite impressive. However, it reads too much like a how-to manual or a textbook. I may have a go to clean that up. Baccyak4H ( Yak!) 16:54, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Personally, I think it's a great article, and wouldn't change a thing. I expected to have to dedicate at least an hour of jumping back and forward between definitions in other articles, but I walk away after 20 minutes with a good grasp of the subject. It guided me through clear, concise examples, with an accessible but not oversimplified explanation, and I found the tone a pleasure to read. It reads more like a seasoned teacher than like a scientific article (of which I've had my fill these last few days), without sacrificing seriousness. Thank you! 213.245.23.234 ( talk) 19:24, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
@ 2604:2000:E083:9400:AC90:4488:F6B8:1E6D: The article is not in violation of copyright:
The Copyvio Report reports similarities to https://www.slideshare.net/Eklavyagupta/multivariate-adaptive-regression-splines-71969518 . That web page was published in Feb 2017, as stated on the web page.
The original text for this Wikipedia article "Multivariate adaptive regression splines" was published in July 2008.
By comparing these dates, we see that the Slideshare web page mentioned above copied the Wikipedia article, not the other way round.
Stephen Milborrow ( talk) 02:33, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
I think the formula is missing some terms just before max(0, 200 - vis). The formula should be [...] 0.016 max(0, wind - 7) + c max(0, 200 - vis) where c is a small coefficient (about 0.035 if I had to guess). TyrHexFF ( talk) 08:35, 15 March 2023 (UTC)