This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to
animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can
the article attached to this page, help out with the
open tasks, or contribute to the
discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
Can we add his abilities as well?
Virman1996 (
talk) 17:21, 19 January 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Virman1996: Yes, that can be added under a section named characterization similar to
Violet Parr. ―
Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 18:17, 19 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Requested move 30 January 2022
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: MovedSceptre (
talk) 02:12, 7 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Support. As much as I hate placing a fictional character ahead of a living person, the pageviews don't lie, and Bob Parr of The Incredibles is the primary topic. I think
Bob Parr (TV producer) would be a better title for the other article, however.
162 etc. (
talk) 16:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment: No comment on the central question, but if the current article at the base name is moved, "producer" is more appropriate than "contractor" (and lowercase should be used). The suggested title makes him sound like someone you might hire to remodel your house, whereas this guy has received six Primetime Emmy Awards. —
BarrelProof (
talk) 17:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Support in principle regarding the primary topic but I concur that "producer" is a more suitable dab, and of course it needs to be lower case. Schwede66 17:36, 30 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Support But other article as producer. ―
Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 01:44, 31 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Support as per above
Kpddg(talk) 08:13, 31 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Support 2nd, neutral on 1st, the character gets 4,394 views compared with only 127[
[1]] for the contractor but PT swaps can cause problems though less so when there are only 2 topics. The qualifier for the contractor should be lower case if that is being used though. Crouch, Swale (
talk) 09:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Support moving the second one to
Bob Parr (TV producer) first as that is a more recognisable profession to contractor. I also agree in moving the fictional character to base name and use a hatnote in case the reader was looking for the producer.
Iggy (
Swan) (
Contribs) 15:26, 2 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Memes
Can you add the internet memes and their unusual long lifespan of this meme? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
98.148.167.84 (
talk) 00:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)reply
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —
Community Tech bot (
talk) 12:37, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
other versions of the meme
in the meme part of the article it should say something, about the other versions of the meme. since there is not only becoming uncanny there is also canny,angry,confused,old,idiot,sad, and more.
IPAexpert (
talk) 00:20, 25 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Requested move 16 August 2023
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support Similar to my !vote on the Elastigirl one, this is an example of
WP:COMMONNAME overriding what their name "technically" is.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 08:04, 16 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Support Yes that's the common name.
desmay (
talk) 22:32, 21 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Support, for consistency with character names with Pixar characters which have their own articles, such as Woody and Mater where alternative names are known.
Iggy (
Swan) (
Contribs) 15:46, 22 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.