Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DadOfTheYear2022 ( talk · contribs) 16:49, 15 April 2022 (UTC) reply

' GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR): d ( copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a ( major aspects): b ( focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Hello, I'm reviewing this article. All neutrals are currently placeholders, and will be changed once I work on it. DadOfTheYear2022 ( talk) 16:49, 15 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Disregard the below comment, I believe that it's properly tagged. Article is good in my eyes. DadOfTheYear2022 ( talk) 18:30, 15 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Initial Comments

• I am unfamiliar with the sourcing for images, so the image of the trimba prevents my approval on that part. Otherwise, this looks good. DadOfTheYear2022 ( talk) 17:18, 15 April 2022 (UTC) reply