This article deserves GA status. It is well written, neutral, stable and well referenced with in-line citations. A few minor problems had been fixed during the review, as documented below.
Materialscientist (
talk) 05:41, 7 October 2009 (UTC)reply
Please check the dead links
here and "citation needed" tags.
Tried to get rid of all but one of them. The australian one needs more time.--
Stone (
talk) 12:43, 27 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Removed the australian reference and added two others.--
Stone (
talk) 21:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Clarify "free oxygen" (gas, atoms, else ?)
This is diatomic oxygen gas. --
Stone (
talk) 20:31, 27 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Changed to oxygen. free is missleading.--
Stone (
talk) 21:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Clarify "alkaline water"
strong base like potassium hydroxide in water--
Stone (
talk) 20:31, 27 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Changed.--
Stone (
talk) 21:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)reply
"reached a peak of $103,000 per tonne in June 2005" - why?
The resposible person is not named! I think it is like always, high demand and a lot of gamblers on the stock market.--
Stone (
talk) 20:31, 27 September 2009 (UTC)reply
added the phrase: due to increased demand.--
Stone (
talk) 21:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Is it true that oxidation state zero is among the most stable ones ? How about 2+ (sulfides) ? This refers to bolding some values in the oxidation state table.
Zero is stable enough if it is bulk material, but you are right it is not among the most stable ones in the lab.--
Stone (
talk) 12:43, 27 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Changed.--
Stone (
talk) 21:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)reply
I changed some {{chem templates into usual <sub, <sup because the formulas get split up at line break.
Materialscientist (
talk) 10:02, 27 September 2009 (UTC)reply
This is just a hint that the info on number of Mo enzymes is obsolete in the article. Could you update that?
Materialscientist (
talk) 11:15, 30 September 2009 (UTC)reply