From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mikey Neumann/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: David Fuchs ( talk · contribs) 16:40, 27 December 2019 (UTC) reply

{{ doing}} Should have a review up by the middle of next week. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 16:40, 27 December 2019 (UTC) reply

  • Overall, the article is generally solid. I've performed a minor copyedit, mostly focused on reducing redundancies, in content and also syntax.
  • Images: One image, kind of blurry and terrible but in a quick look for better stuff that's either freely available or potentially free didn't find anything. Such is the life of minor biographies. Properly tagged regardless.
  • References: Statements cited to appropriate reliable sources. Did a quick spot-check to statements attributed to refs 2, 3, 10, 14, and 20, and did not spot any issues. Went on a look and didn't find any major sources of information that could be used, so seems to meet comprehensiveness concerns for GA.

Since the major criteria are hit, I'm passing as a GA. -- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 12:39, 3 January 2020 (UTC) reply