This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Materials, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Materials on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaterialsWikipedia:WikiProject MaterialsTemplate:WikiProject MaterialsMaterials articles
This article has been rated as Top-importance on the
importance scale.
False notion of 'scientific'
The article per 15.04.2017 states that a proper scientific notion of the concept 'material' excludes the possibility of a material of anything to be itself living. This is a notion that is not scientific, merely a result of a conventional cognition; such habitual ways of thinking are to my understanding pretty exactly what is defined as un-scientific. It might be that one naturally think of the
genome, for instant, one organisms genetically inherited material, in total, as a non-living material, because our anchestors are dead perhaps; but quite the contrary, this prime example of the material, is very much alive, and a definitive property of anything living. I will therefor attempt to edit, correct the fallacy. --
Xactnorge (
talk) 14:16, 15 April 2017 (UTC) hello??????????????????reply
How many colours we have now for ..
to drawing "The Pixture of the World !!" ??
No only "Bl","Gr", "Re". Now - 10! Known as "Table of the elementary partys". 3*3 and +1.
How many .. "Жуть!", "Шик!", "Мрак!", "Блеск!" .. ??
176.59.200.25 (
talk) 00:38, 12 June 2020 (UTC)reply