This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
cities,
towns and various other
settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Richmond, Virginia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Richmond, VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject Richmond, VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject Richmond, VirginiaRichmond, Virginia articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames articles
User:80.195.188.66 added a link to a commercial website and then moved it above the link to the official council website. I have removed it. --
Etimbo |
Talk 13:01, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
..."almost entirely of suburban development"...
A completely misleading statement! The huge areas of parkland which dominate the map show that the suburban development is only in the TW1 and TW2 parts of Twickenham and the town of Richmond itself following through to Mortlake and Barnes.
Peter Shearan 12:04, 13 October 2005 (UTC)reply
I have therefore spent the past two hours revising it. I have also completed the article (in a series) which connects with it:
Richmond parks and open spacesPeter Shearan 13:04, 13 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Aren't parks and open spaces features of suburban development? I understand the misunderstanding, its much clearer now. To some the word suburban creates images of endless rows of houses but to others it is of lots of green too.
MRSC 14:52, 13 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Hyphenation
For the record, both "Richmond upon Thames" and "Kingston upon Thames" are unhyphenated, unlike "Stratford-upon-Avon", "Newcastle-upon-Tyne", etc. I have removed hyphens from one instance and added a comment. —
Paul G 09:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Newcastle upon Tyne is not hyphenated, for the record. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2.26.84.126 (
talk) 15:18, 2 March 2012 (UTC)reply
Richmond, The American International University in London
I have removed the external link and put in an internal link to it. I felt it should be internal as there is already a article that discusses it. --
Abdulha (
talk) 15:44, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Abdulhareply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
London Borough of Richmond upon Thames. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.