List of San Francisco Municipal Railway lines is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones Date Process Result August 15, 2006 Articles for deletion Kept January 21, 2009 Peer review Reviewed February 21, 2010 Featured list candidate Promoted January 3, 2019 Articles for deletion Kept January 28, 2019 Peer review Not reviewed Current status: Featured list

This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Trains: Streetcars Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars. Buses Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article is pretty big (54K), so should it be split in some way? I'm thinking that each section in this article could be moved into its own article, and this article could be turned into a more simple list with all of the lines that links to the more detailed articles. Octoferret 15:18, 23 April 2006 (UTC) reply

I'm not sure we really need 50 or 60 separate articles for each Muni line. There's a PDF link for each, and people can go to the website for more info. Zepheus 07:01, 1 May 2006 (UTC) reply

You can create new articles for the important lines (such as the 38 Geary or the 15 Third), but splitting this article may not be a good idea. Physicq210 18:55, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply

(reviving discussion) I was thinking of splitting the article to further categorize the wikitable like categorizing the routes to crosstown, community service, to/from downtown, stuff like that. Any thoughts? — B o L 03:11, 27 February 2008 (UTC) reply

You may have noticed I have created lots of red links for creating bus route stubs. You can create a redirect on the 38 Geary to the B Geary if you want. You can delete/revert these links for all I care. Goodshoped35110s 03:37, 30 September 2007 (UTC) reply

I think people should add each new table columns for the year when each current Muni line was founded, just like in the "now-defunct lines" list. The Good Guy ( talk) 04:44, 4 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Can someone upload a picture of a bus running on Route Number 56 for this? -- Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 14:36, 22 September 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Thegoodguy3221: If there a screenshot of the 44 Owl displaying as 44 OWL can show it?

🥇BUS rider2015 ( talk) . 22:57, 19 March 2018 (UTC) reply

I saw one designated on a headsign at Potrero Division even during the day, but unfortunately cannot get a picture of it. Sorry. The Good Guy ( talk) 23:01, 19 March 2018 (UTC) reply

@ Pi.1415926535: I notice some buses now stop at Salesforce Transit Center now, will this be allowed to edit in? Colton Meltzer ( talk) 22:52, 29 June 2018 (UTC) reply

I've corrected the terminal information. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 02:25, 30 June 2018 (UTC) reply

@ Pi.1415926535: i thought the city officially using name Salesforce Transit Center, but both are correct. Colton Meltzer ( talk) 02:43, 30 June 2018 (UTC) reply

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect San Francisco Bus Rapid Transit and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion is happening at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 8#San Francisco Bus Rapid Transit until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay (talk) 16:39, 15 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Can anyone tell me why routes 47 and 49 were diselectrified? Clrichey ( talk) 02:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC) reply

@ RickyCourtney: Anchors directly on rows of tables aren't great - they mean that the target row is at the very top of the screen and often partially cut off. That's why I put the anchors a few rows ahead. If you have a better way to do it, I'd be thrilled. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 00:50, 7 December 2022 (UTC) reply

See Los Angeles Metro Bus. The trick is to top align the route column. When you link to the anchor -- it'll always be at the top of the page. Now, if your concern is including the text at the top of the section, that's a different discussion. RickyCourtney ( talk) 00:59, 7 December 2022 (UTC) reply