This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is a former featured list candidate. Please view its sub-page to see why the nomination failed. Once the objections have been addressed you may resubmit the article for featured list status. |
I've deleted this list as almost all of them are now incorrect with the new constituency naming structure and editing individual entries to match correct locations would take ages! Use the list at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Parliamentary Constituencies instead -- Vamp: Willow 13:16, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
Having a starting list of MPs from the last election stikes me as too dangerous. It will not be possible to know which constituencies have been updated and which have not. I have therefore added two new columns to hold the MP and party elected in the election. I did consider remove the previous MPs entirely as they probably don't belong in this list. However, I have left the names their as it would make copy and pasting easier where MPs haven't changed. I am still hopeful there will be a way to do the whole table in one go. MarkS 19:02, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
Sheesh, my arm hurts now. I'm going to take a rest for a bit. If anyone wants to take over then feel free, otherwise I will carry on later. Lan3y - Talk 00:29, May 6, 2005 (UTC)
The diagram i have put on this page has a lot of white space around it. why? please, can someone help - i have spent too long on it and reached the edge of my wikibility.
All constituencies now have links to the appropriate constituency page (I hope) Maltaran 21:14, May 12, 2005 (UTC)
I feel that the page is cumbersome at the moment since it is dealing with the 2005 election results and tracking changes since then (e.g. for the death of the recent MP). I propose that we create two pages:
If we don't make a change like this now, we will actually lose the historical record which an encyclopedia should track
Any Comments? ChrisUK 21:59, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
Is the Graphical representation of the House of Commons (which I found it really great) reflects the real position of the seats and the shape of the UK house of commons (rectangular shape with a rocket-like gap in the middle)? CG 07:31, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
Could someone with some researches improve the graphical representation of the UK house of common so it become more realistic? CG 12:04, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
One suggestion on the FLC is to use the party colours, so I've had an attempt at implementing a scheme. I didn't want to do it *all* and then find someone's got a better idea, so this is my idea here -- Joolz 14:27, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
I've noticed that some of the other lists (e.g MPs elected in the UK general election, 1966) have the A, B, C (et al) titles inside the tables, instead of outside. Which do people prefer? Also, is the "Previous MP" column slightly unneccessary, it's nice to have but the list might be better without it and just have the 'previous party'? -- Joolz 15:39, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
How about this version:
Constituency | Elected MP | Elected Party | Previous Party | ||
Aberavon | Hywel Francis | Labour | |||
Aberdeen North | Frank Doran | Labour | |||
Aberdeen South | Anne Begg | Labour | |||
Aberdeenshire West and Kincardine | Sir Robert Smith, Bt | Liberal Democrat | |||
Airdrie and Shotts | John Reid | Labour | |||
Aldershot | Gerald Howarth | Conservative | |||
Aldridge-Brownhills | Richard Shepherd | Conservative | |||
Altrincham and Sale West | Graham Brady | Conservative | |||
Alyn and Deeside | Mark Tami | Labour | |||
Amber Valley | Judy Mallaber | Labour | |||
An Example | Chris Smith | Liberal Democrat | Labour | ||
Angus | Michael Weir | Scottish National Party | |||
Another Example | John Smith | Conservative | Liberal Democrat | ||
Argyll and Bute | Alan Reid | Liberal Democrat | |||
Arundel and South Downs | Nick Herbert | Conservative | |||
Ashfield | Geoff Hoon | Labour | |||
Ashford | Damian Green | Conservative | |||
Ashton-under-Lyne | David Heyes | Labour | |||
Aylesbury | David Lidington | Conservative | |||
Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock | Sandra Osborne | Labour | |||
Ayrshire North and Arran | Katy Clark | Labour |
-- Joolz 17:08, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
I want to remove the previous MPs+Party column, although it's interesting it's covered by the 2001 list already; it adds substantially to the length of the page and makes it unwieldy and as someone pointed out on the FLC page some of the previous MPs are purely notional because of boundary changes/constituency creations, what does everyone think? -- Joolz 14:36, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
East Yorkshire and East Worthing and Shoreham seem to be missing... Sjorford 11:31, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
Shouldn't the SDLP be included on the Labour side of the graphical representation as they accept the Labour whip?
I am amazed how everybody keeps reporting the number of Conservative MPs in the House Of Commons as 195. It is currently 197. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.26.145 ( talk) 10:56, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Southwesterner258 ( talk) 20:32, 26 January 2011 (UTC) The arrangement between the SDLP and Labour was informal, but if you watch any video clips of parliament from 1997-2010 you will see SDLP members sitting on the government benches.
Shouldn't they be a different colour other than red? As strickly speaking, they are not only or exclusively "Labour" 81.111.221.11 ( talk) 22:46, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
I agree, because I also believe that the co-op/Labour groups should have their own colour, as they are representing two parties at the same time. ( 217.42.240.189 ( talk) 11:54, 11 August 2009 (UTC))
Well, after further examination on article one, they use a red slightly darker than Labour. However, the Co-operative party's website is light blue. So maybe we should use light blue for them?
1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liverpool_West_Derby_(UK_Parliament_constituency)
co-op party
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Co-operative_Party
( 217.42.240.189 ( talk) 17:00, 11 August 2009 (UTC))
I don't know what will happen if the lib-dems and Labour were to join, but as an ex-lib dem myself, I highly daught it will happen. However, I still do believe that the CO-OP party/ Labour should have their own list, because after all, the MPs representing them are a 50/50 party. ( TheGreenwalker ( talk) 20:35, 17 September 2009 (UTC))
The 54th it may be, but it's not the 54th parliament! A new parliament is constituted after each time the Queen summons one, and happens at the State Opening, which is each year nowadays. The House of Commons (which is only a part of Parliament, remember) may very well have the same members as when the previous parliament was proprogued at the start of the summer. What does this "54th" actually refer to? It is the 54th General Election ? Or something more obscure? This is a Wikipedia article, so we mustn't be inaccurate, even if politicians are misusing the terminology. Neuralwarp ( talk) 16:45, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
The table at the top of the article is misleading, the number of MPs only adds up to 645 for the "election" column. This is because Sylvia Hermon hasn't been counted as an Ulster Unionist- there is no mention of the party here. Surely the table shouldn't just focus on the affiliation of MPs at dissolution? Especially as it is now inaccurate. Southwesterner258 ( talk) 20:38, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
The first column of numbers in the composition table appears to add up to 645, not 646.-- 86.178.142.210 ( talk) 06:11, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
List of MPs elected in the United Kingdom general election, 2005. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of MPs elected in the United Kingdom general election, 2005. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:01, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of MPs in the first United Kingdom Parliament which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 21:34, 2 December 2022 (UTC)