This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
I would suggest option 2, with the following additions
1) A link to the graphs on the main "List of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches" page.
2) Trimming the legends on this page to only reflect what appears in the graph here. For instance, in Rocket Configurations only two configurations were used: "Falcon 9 Block 5" and "Falcon 9 Block 5 (reused)."
AmigaClone (
talk) 05:46, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
@
AmigaClone What are your thoughts on a 2020-2029 summary page and then transcluding the graphs into this page?
Ergzay (
talk) 00:45, 31 March 2024 (UTC)reply
A 2020-2029 summary page containing a small header, the collection of graphs for that time range, and links to the actual launch pages sounds good.
Transcluding information from another page seems like something that would be helpful with several connected articles that might have changing information to keep that consistent between the various pages - which is not the case with these graphs 2023 and earlier.
AmigaClone (
talk) 05:47, 31 March 2024 (UTC)reply
@
AmigaClone@
Ergzay hi to prevent this problem, I have added 2022 launches that are only 61 in number. Also the problem of only 2 categories in Rocket Configurations is prevented. who cares of symmetricity, in future if 2023 and 2024 needs to be removed, they are welcome without need of 2025 also with them. If you didn't live my concept revert it.
Another way is r7 family launches, they have graphs only on main page.
—🪦NΛSΛB1058 (
TALK) 06:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
RIP B1058 Next time, you should discuss with people BEFORE making this kind of large change. Just like I did before the creation of this page.
Ergzay (
talk) 18:17, 12 April 2024 (UTC)reply
This move needed discussion? If so, then extremely sorry.
—🪦NΛSΛB1058 (
TALK) 03:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!