This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
This section has its first 9 sentences unsourced. Some of them might be covered by the liner notes, but i have my doubts over the next:
""La Llamada" was the first song recorded for Live! (1993)."
"The song was intended to be one of three studio tracks for Selena's Live! album."
"Astudillo and Quintanilla III had spent an hour writing a song together."
"They wanted to write a song that many woman face with their boyfriends. Quintanilla III had wanted to empower woman letting them know that they should hold their heads up and remember that life goes on." and
"Selena favored the lyrical content and central theme, which she commonly done in her career."
Yes they all belong to
FN#1 Selena's family and friends gave commentaries for each track.
Jonayo!Selena 4 ever 16:14, 23 June 2012 (UTC)reply
Ok. Great. —
Hahc21 16:24, 23 June 2012 (UTC)reply
Critical
"Sue Anne Pressley of the Chicago Sun-Times believed "La Llamada" is a "fan favorite"," >> "Sue Anne Pressley of the Chicago Sun-Times believed "La Llamada" to be a "fan favorite"," or "Sue Anne Pressley of the Chicago Sun-Times believed that "La Llamada" is a "fan favorite","
"though commented that the song is the least memorable song on Live!." >> "commented that it was the least memorable song on Live!."
Why? How can someones comments towards a song they criticize be past-tense? I can't find any source that indicated s/he changed their minds, so the sentence would have to be in present-tense tone.
Jonayo!Selena 4 ever 16:14, 23 June 2012 (UTC)reply
Ups. What I meant is that you used "the song" twice too closely: "that the song is the least memorably song..."
Split table into two: each one for each year. Also, why it says "Unknown" on the peak for "US Billboard Regional Mexican Digital Songs"? Until the chart position is available, the chart entry must go.
(a) please
look at this FA song, (b) the peak positions are only available for subscribers which I am not, so it's a Billboard chart which makes it notable enough for inclusion unless there are guidelines that suggest otherwise?
Jonayo!Selena 4 ever 16:14, 23 June 2012 (UTC)reply
Yes, but all those entries has their respective positions. I know some of the charts are subsc-only, but if you cannot look at the position, then you may not include it until you find it, since it's useless to say it charted on A if you do not provide the peak. —
Hahc21 16:18, 23 June 2012 (UTC)reply
Can you further explain please? I don't see any difference from the FA song article to this one. Best,
Jonayo!Selena 4 ever 17:52, 23 June 2012 (UTC)reply
On
Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It), all charts has their correct peak position. Example: Czech Airplay Chart, the position is No.13; Japan Hot 100, the position is No.25. None of the charts there says "unknown" on the "peak position" field. —
Hahc21 19:49, 23 June 2012 (UTC)reply
Because Jivesh can find those sources using Billboard, however, the site does not include many other charts such as the one listed here. It is a notable chart, solely because it is published by Billboard, so me just removing a chart the song peaked on makes no sense. Right now the peak is not, and maybe, never will be available but I see no guideline that states charts with unknown peak positions should be removed. Best,
Jonayo!Selena 4 ever 02:45, 24 June 2012 (UTC)reply
Hey why did you removed it? I was looking for if it could be kept or not. Well, sorry for the delay. All has been fixed. I'll be in touch to find an answer for the chart "curiosity", if I can call it that way. —
Hahc21 23:25, 24 June 2012 (UTC)reply
It'll go on hold until those issues are solved and i'll provide more comments. —
Hahc21 05:24, 23 June 2012 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved.
Jenks24 (
talk) 06:56, 6 August 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
La Llamada. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.