I can tell this article was carefully put together. It is certainly acceptable as a Good Article. If you consider trying Feature Articles, please solicit a copyedit beforehand. --
maclean 19:27, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
1. Well written. I made a few copyedit changes, mostly removing excess words or adding commas. Two sentences stuck out though:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable - references look good and properly used via inline citations.
3. Broad in its coverage - covers major aspects of his life and works.
4. Neutral - yes.
5. Stable - yes.
6. Illustrated appropriately - all images are relevant and properly licensed.