This article was nominated for
deletion on 26 March 2019. The result of
the discussion was no consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
The sources from
The Daily Signal and
The Weekly Standard would count towards
WP:GNGif they presented significant coverage on Kenneth Preston himself. However, these sources (as well as the other linked sources above) are focused on the investigation mentioned
here. Regarding Kenneth Preston, it is not true that each of these sources addresses the topic directly and in detail (per GNG). Therefore Kenneth Preston does not pass
WP:GNG. On top of that, this falls squarely into
WP:BLP1E. If a new article is created specifically about this investigation, then this material can be merged there instead.
Any thoughts? If not, I'll go ahead and perform the merge. —
MarkH21 (
talk) 23:43, 19 April 2019 (UTC)reply