This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please
join the discussion and add your name to the
list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry articles
May I ask concerning the rationale about this recent move from a standard biographical article about a notable individual to this somewhat peculiar and particular name? --
Saddhiyama (
talk) 22:11, 29 July 2012 (UTC)reply
I strongly object to the fact that there wasn't even a link posted on the talk pages of the involved articles to the discussion at the Masonry Project. The proper place for a merger discussion is at the discussion pages of the articles themselves.
I can see that there are good reasons for a merger, but I do not agree to a renaming of the Karl Gotthelf von Hund article. The current title is simply not encyclopedic, and the Strict Observance information could easily have been added to the biographical article without any need to rename it. --
Saddhiyama (
talk) 22:47, 29 July 2012 (UTC)reply
I can see your point, in fact you may have noted that this was my original suggestion when merger was mentioned. I also note that yours is the only edit that added substantial content to the article between the creation of the stub to my expansion from the German Wikipedia. I'm afraid this led me to suppose that nobody else particularly cared. Since you have no objection to the merger, our only point of friction is the name. I am unable to see why this prevents the sensible redirection of
Rite of Strict Observance.
The rest is my inexperience with Wikipedia. I asked for advice, I thought I had followed it, I missed the help page. For this, I apologise unreservedly.
Fiddlersmouth (
talk) 00:08, 30 July 2012 (UTC)reply
No worries. Regarding mergers it is best to go through the proper channels as explained on
Wikipedia:Merging. After all there may be editors who have watchlisted the article, and who haven't made any edits to it, yet still holds strong opinions regarding relatively large changes such as this one. --
Saddhiyama (
talk) 10:58, 3 August 2012 (UTC)reply
Couldn't find the merge discussion. I don't think this use of "and" in an article title is normal (i.e. covered by the types of exception mentioned at
WP:AND). Do we have consensus to rename this back to
Karl Gotthelf von Hund] (i.e move over redirect)? Since the redirect has since been edited, I believe this requires administrator action. --
Boson (
talk) 08:49, 3 August 2012 (UTC)reply
I think we have consensus, now we just need to contact and admin to carry it out. --
Saddhiyama (
talk) 10:58, 3 August 2012 (UTC)reply