![]() | This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
He has other columns going back at least to 2001 on a wide range of cultural issues including pornography, the clash between Muslim sensibilities and freedom of speech, fighting AIDS in Africa. In 2001 and 2002, some columns in the Bristol Post identified him as an expert on the Middle East and he wrote about the Iraeli-Palestinian conflict from his Biblical perspective.
Thatcher131 20:48, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
The AfD was a no consensus due to many new and inconsistent users voting keep. It was recently uncovered at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of TRACS members that a banned user User: Jason Gastrich (banned according to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jason Gastrich) has been using a personal website to send people to wikipedia to keep all Christian related articles despite the reasons for deleting them. Many susepct users voted keep in votes Michaelwmoss ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) in both AfDs and others have openly admitted being sent by outside groups to keep the articles. [1] However, a Gastrich supporter hints that he was sent to AfDs by Gastrich yet refuses to clarify his answer. [2] This is deceitful and in violation of wikipedia policy. Arbusto 20:35, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
But I don't see why people would have to be persuaded to keep the article...the evidence that was provided was all legitimate and valid and almost certainly certified his notability. I certainly didn't use any sort of underhand persuasion to sway votes. I've read all the evidence and certainly believe that the criteria for inclusion of biographies have been met. Abbyemery 21:06, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Jonathan Skinner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:29, 26 April 2017 (UTC)