A content mill is the only major similarity in content; the 1979 LPC report has slightly higher similarity due to several organization names and at least one book title, but from there, there are no serious copyvio concerns. Spot checks in areas with online sources reveal no close paraphrasing issues.
The article has logical organization and covers the building's architectural, technical and historic dimensions cleanly. The article's focus on the building helps a lot in avoiding focus issues.
Images are all freely licensed or have had copyright lapse (the older illustration and photo). One is used in the infobox, and the others are used to illustrate specific areas of the article with accompanying captions.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Hard to ask much more of the page besides the missing word and comma fixes which I supplied. This article passes.
Sammi Brie (she/her •
t •
c) 02:26, 11 March 2021 (UTC)reply