This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Discrimination This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles Romani people This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Romani people, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romani people on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Romani peopleWikipedia:WikiProject Romani peopleTemplate:WikiProject Romani peopleRomani people articles

A few weeks ago, 207.108.250.158 ( talk · contribs) was blocked for edit warring over the insertion of POV content that relied heavily upon original research and synthesis of sources to attempt to support the biased content. Today, 81.183.101.42 ( talk · contribs) appears to be restoring the same content to the article. Some of the claims in the addition do appear to be appropriately sourced; the primary problem is that the additions attempt to synthesize/extrapolate from the data in the sources to attempt to imply a broader issue than is actually supported by the sources provided, and to suggest conclusions that are not states or directly supported by the sources. --- Barek ( talk • contribs) - 15:27, 29 May 2009 (UTC) reply

"This article has serious POV problems. The Gypsy point of view completely predominates, slanted language is used - especially the Hungarian discrimination and Romani exodus section, the point of view of Hungarians is not taken seriously" , "it would be best if someone with more knowledge tried to fix some of these problems" written by Kostja in the talk page of Roma in Hungary article. I absolutely agree with these statements. It's true in this talk page also.-- Rovibroni ( talk) 18:09, 11 June 2010 (UTC) reply

"academic researchers and members of the mainstream press disregard" Who? There are two weasel-words in this sentence.-- Rovibroni ( talk) 18:29, 11 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Just to be clear, there is no one "Gypsy point of view," nor is there one "Hungarian point of view:" such an assumption is racist and insulting. It is especially insulting to the many non-Roma Hungarians who oppose discrimination against the Roma.- Darouet ( talk) 21:21, 29 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Or insulting to Hungarian villagers by the Gypsies. Darouet, try to edit without emotions. -- Norden1990 ( talk) 21:45, 29 April 2013 (UTC) reply

In this case I agree with you: to assume that there is one "gypsy" and one "Hungarian" viewpoint could also be insulting to Hungarian villagers. - Darouet ( talk) 22:24, 29 April 2013 (UTC) reply

We can't have insults to 'Hungarian villagers', or any other villagers. What insults are the problem here? RashersTierney ( talk) 23:03, 29 April 2013 (UTC) reply

I'm not sure this article is necessary as a separate article at all, as it seems to be almost identical to a section of the Roma in Hungary article that links to it. 93.96.236.8 ( talk) 10:25, 5 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Really poor article. It should be deleted altogether. For one thing, it's absolute nonsense that high school drop-out rates or low enrolling rates necessarily mean discrimination against the Roma. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.167.167 ( talk • contribs) 18:38, 29 March 2011 (UTC) reply