![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
Index
|
|||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
It should start with the already existing article of jews in otoman empire .
The article, which is of a topic that is highly sensative, was improperly merged two months ago without having many people participate in such a decision.
Although it was a "merge" and not a "delete" to this content, in practice, it was a deletion of the content, since the content wasn't really fully merged to the article Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict.
Since the content of this article was created by quite a few people over the years, I ask anyone whom is considering a merge or a deletion of this content make sure that a peroper discussion be held in the future before making such a decision. WikiJunkie ( talk) 20:43, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
It’s not considered as a conflict when one party is using weapons to kill innocent people. Its terrorism! Israeli’s are nazis! 111.119.188.9 ( talk) 17:45, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
{{
edit extended-protected}}
template. ―
Qwerfjkl (please use {{
reply to|Qwerfjkl}}
on reply)
19:21, 16 May 2021 (UTC)![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Towards the bottom of the "1993–2000: Oslo peace process" section, I believe that "In return for their release Israel sent over the medicine which saved his life and freed a dozen of Palestinian prisoners including Sheikh Ahmad Yassin." should be "In return for their release Israel sent over the medicine which saved his life and freed a dozen Palestinian prisoners including Sheikh Ahmad Yassin." (removing an extraneous "of"). NULLIF ( talk) 15:59, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
"change The history of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict began with the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948. to The history of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict began before the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948." 123.243.38.121 ( talk) 07:02, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Two instances of sentences not starting with an upper case letter.
1. In section "1993–2000: Oslo peace process", "the agreement marked the conclusion of the first stage of" should be changed to "The agreement marked the conclusion of the first stage of".
2. In the section "2000-05: Second Intifada", "in addition, Hamas has openly stated" should be changed to "In addition, Hamas has openly stated". Cvrts ( talk) 20:44, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under The conflict > 2020s, change initially fired At least 2,200 to initially fired at least 2,200 (grammar). V1vipediaa ( talk) 01:37, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
I’m wondering about why Palestines violence is labeled as terrorism in this article but Israel’s is considered a “military operation”? The connotation of these words are obviously problematic when you’re in search of unbiased facts. This is in reference to the beginning of the article, “The conflict has been marked by violence, including terrorist attacks by Palestinian militants and military operations by Israel”. AcuriousKat ( talk) 09:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
1. Revise intro to include information from the section "World War I and aftermath (1917–20)" regarding McMahon–Hussein Correspondence in 1915. And secret side treaty with France, Sykes–Picot Agreement, reneging on the previous agreement. And also reassurances in 1918 from Britain to the arabs that their original agreement was still valid.
Change
"The history of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict traces back to the late 19th century when Zionists sought to establish a homeland for the Jewish people in Ottoman-controlled Palestine. The Balfour Declaration of 1917, issued by the British government, endorsed the idea of a Jewish homeland in Palestine, which led to an influx of Jewish immigrants to the region. "
to
"The history of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict traces back to the late 19th century when Zionists sought to establish a homeland for the Jewish people in Ottoman-controlled Palestine. During World War I, the McMahon–Hussein Correspondence was formed as an agreement in 1915 with Arab leaders to grant sovereignty to Arab lands under Ottoman control to form an Arab state after the war in exchange for the Great Arab Revolt against the Ottomans. However a year later in 1916, a secret treaty known as the Sykes–Picot Agreement between the United Kingdom and France would effectively divide the Ottoman provinces outside the Arabian Peninsula into areas of British and French control and influence.
In 1917, the British government issued the Balfour Declaration to endorsed the idea of a Jewish homeland in Palestine, which led to an influx of Jewish immigrants to the region. To reassure the Arabs of their original agreement, a special message sent on 4 January 1918 from the British Government, carried personally by Commander David George Hogarth to Sherif Hussein, stated that “the Entente Powers are determined that the Arab race shall be given full opportunity of once again forming a nation in the world … So far as Palestine is concerned, we are determined that no people shall be subject to another”. *
2. Change section title "World War I and aftermath (1917–20)"
to
"World War I and aftermath (1915–20)"
3. Add to end of section, "World War I and aftermath (1915–20)"
"A special message (of 4 January 1918) from the British Government, carried personally by Commander David George Hogarth to Sherif Husain, stated that “the Entente Powers are determined that the Arab race shall be given full opportunity of once again forming a nation in the world … So far as Palestine is concerned, we are determined that no people shall be subject to another”.
A 1978 UN report regarding the history of Palestine, made note that "acknowledgements that the British Government had not possessed the right “to dispose of Palestine” appeared decades after the commitments to the Arabs not only had been infringed by the Sykes-Picot agreement but, in disregard of the inherent rights and the wishes of the Palestinian people, the British Government had given Zionist leaders separate assurances regarding the establishment of a “national home for the Jewish people in Palestine”, an undertaking that sowed the seeds of prolonged conflict in Palestine."" *
"Part I, published in 1978, offers historical background of the question of Palestine reaching as far back as 1915. This part surveys in detail the period 1917 to 1947, during most of which Palestine was governed under a mandate granted by the League of Nations." Freerocks ( talk) 20:23, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please place the correct map of Palestine from the 1947 agreement. 125.209.173.220 ( talk) 12:53, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
The phrase "lands purchased legally by Zionist agencies from absentee landlords" needs clarification and if possible citation.
What laws were invoked to establish the legality of the purchase and what was the prior ownership of the lands purchased ?
Was purchase sanctioned by approval of British laws asserted as their claim of conquest arising from WW(I) or was it granted by laws of the ottoman empire with or without consideration of the informal tenure of previous nomadic occupiers or the fellahin ?
Surely there would be outrage at mandatory acquisition of property in many countries if the people dispossessed were not favoured (sic) by groups with a strong lobbying position. DaveDCJ ( talk) 01:43, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
the southern part of which [IS] regarded as Palestine
The bit about Ottoman Syria has parentheses and there should be 'is' instead of 'are'. 2A00:23C6:1E82:8601:A8:9D3E:E00B:E012 ( talk) 05:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
There's no Israeli-Palestinian conflict. There's an Israeli occupation 197.151.112.142 ( talk) 22:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Talking about on this topic 37.111.155.209 ( talk) 06:08, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
As scribes for the history of the world in our current time, we must be diligent to record only facts and leave opinion for other publications.
As one example, the sentence, “The conflict has been marked by violence, including terrorist attacks by Palestinian militants and military operations by Israel.”, is one example. A less biased statement could be, “The conflict has been marked by violence, including militaristic attacks by both Palestinian and Israel.”
From a Palestinian point of view, Israel is both the aggressor and terrorist. BatmanA113 ( talk) 15:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
addtional = additional 2603:8000:D300:3650:6555:4BA5:D8BD:D8BA ( talk) 02:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)