This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hasbro article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I wondered if anybody knew or thought it relevant that Hasbro founded a children's hospital here in RI...it's truly wonderful and called the Hasbro Children's Hospital. I don't actually know to what extent it was funded by the hasbro company, but assume it must have been substantial to have provided the name.
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hi I would like to make a edit because I found this link saying that hasbro has reported a lost, and it wasn’t because of the Coronavirus (I wasn’t doing anything wrong). Link: https://www.fool.com/investing/2020/05/06/1-factor-took-hasbro-to-loss-hint-not-coronavirus.aspx. 2600:1004:B01E:280B:9948:A0D9:F8DF:A54B ( talk) 20:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I want to add this piece of information just recently released about hasbro reporting a loss from buying Entertainment One. Link: https://www.fool.com/investing/2020/05/06/1-factor-took-hasbro-to-loss-hint-not-coronavirus.aspx. 2600:1004:B01E:280B:9948:A0D9:F8DF:A54B ( talk) 21:20, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
This page needs admin attention from this vandal that seems to wish to get into a edit war with other users, because they disagree with something being added ot the article. To my knowledge Wikipedia was about a consensus, not one user rules the entire site, and several users are trying to include news, while one user says they re not allowed to and constantly deleted their edits through reversion. Recent events are not able to updated instantly, and other editors must give people time to find proper and relevant sources, and should not be allowed to start an edit war over them, so why is this user constantly doing this for the past week on this article? shadzar- talk 03:41, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
If there are better refs to be found, we should probably mention something about this. As it was [1], it appears to be simply soapboxing for business-humanrights.org, which I can find no RSN discussions on, and appears to be something to be treated as a primary source with no weight of it's own. I don't see it mentioned in either of the independent sources, so there's nothing to give it any weight.
Since years have passed since the reports were released, we need better refs to demonstrate encyclopedic value. -- Hipal ( talk) 18:18, 25 August 2022 (UTC)