This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to
ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
In May this article was marked as needing references and its notability was questioned. I have since added content as has another user. How can we remove the notices saying it needs references etc.? Thanks
Virginia C. Phillips (
talk) 10:39, 4 July 2011 (UTC)reply
If you believe that there is enough references in the article and problems have been fixed, remove the tags. Please note that ANY editor in good standing can just as easily readd the tags.--Thewikifyer's corner 22:53, 5 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Unpublished references
I'm concerned about the use of the following unpublished references:
Ahmad, S., A. Kim, S. Kim, and M. Sangma. (2005). The Hajong of Bangladesh: A sociolinguistic survey. Unpublished manuscript.
Kinny, E. and I. Zeliang. (2005). A Sociolinguistic survey among the Hajong of India. Unpublished manuscript.
Per
reliable source, "Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources..."
Are there reasons these should be exceptions?--
SPhilbrickT</> 16:42, 6 July 2011 (UTC)reply
British Era sources
Per
consensus and
general policy here in Wikipedia, we do not use British Raj era sources when it comes to ethnic groups. So such changes will be removed. -
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 10:26, 27 February 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Chaipau: Not to mention, the British sources do not provide any thing of importance other than to introduce scientific racism in an ethnic article, that is discouraged in Wikipedia. I'm going to add a bit for the migration part sourced from a journal present already
[1]. Please see if you can contribute in it. -
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 11:34, 1 March 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Fylindfotberserk: That looks like a good source, but I can access only part of it. Is it available via Wikipedia library? Besides, Bareh (a well know scholar) is also probably a good source.
Chaipau (
talk) 13:47, 2 March 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Chaipau: No only the excerpts. Don't know whether available in Wikipedia library. Kindly use Bareh if needed. -
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 14:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Worldbruce: I don't think Nath (1989) supports the remaining content in that sentence after
this. -
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 19:54, 8 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Feel free to remove the remainder if you're confident Nath doesn't support it. Skimming his book, I thought it more or less said so (maybe not on the exact page cited, but within a page or two), but it isn't my area of expertise.
Worldbruce (
talk) 20:05, 8 March 2022 (UTC)reply
You are right. I've included a range of pages, since that would better represent the content. -
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 08:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)reply