This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This user User:188.29.42.224 deleted very important points regarding al-Haddad's extremism. I've reverted all changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blix1900 ( talk • contribs) 00:36, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
This article needs better and more sources. At the moment, we only have the website of his own organisation as source. can anyone provide those sources? Jeff5102 ( talk) 21:15, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Please can someone help, report him? I'm quite a wiki newbie. Thanks. Hamnavoe ( talk) 18:13, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
User:82.4.68.91 has repeatedly vandalised the page as well as hurl, what seem to be, insults at those who edit this page with integrity. Can we consider locking it, please?
This isn't the first time this page has been vandalised to white-wash the speaker's history. (See above). — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Blix1900 (
talk •
contribs) 13:13, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
—--
I think as well the page deserves to be locked. btw: guys - look into the Revision history at THIS comment: 11:18, 10 May 2012 82.4.68.91 (talk) . . (1,662 bytes) (-438) . . (This contribution is vital and yours are false inventions. Truth, Justice and Peace 2, Far right, neo con, zionist,sufi, brelvi satan worshiper 0.) - HE IS CALLING US A SUFI SATAN WORSHIPPERS. That's a great magic of the unwanted... our vandalizing guy would be a Salafi (as Haddad) I think. He clearly hates sufi, that's a VERY bad sign...
Hamnavoe (
talk) 05:48, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
It hasn't even been 24 hours from his/her last ban and
82.4.68.91 has already started trolling this page. Glad Admin have warned him again. Please stop this - the constant violations are becoming tedious.
Blix1900 (
talk) 23:07, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
aha.. so the only reason whe he did stop vandalizing the page was because of his ban.... grim. He can't even use a talk... btw Blix you've added exactly what I wanted... really thanks.. being a Wiki-newbie ;)
Hamnavoe (
talk) 18:46, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Hey User:Hamnavoe, that's a very interesting quote from al-Haddad. Pure supremacism, and definitely controversial as well as the fact it was given at such a prominent Mosque in the UK.
Could I ask you produce a short transcript of the point your making and add as a quote? It helps clear up anomalies although, after watching the video, it's clear he's controversial and a Islamist supremacist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blix1900 ( talk • contribs) 21:12, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
WP:BLP and of course WP:NPOV apply to this article. Unsourced material will be removed. Do not add it. Alexbrn ( talk) 09:36, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi User:Hamnavoe. I'm not sure if you're the one to speak with on this issue. I am trying to edit an article on Wikipedia about Haitham al-Haddad. I feel the current article does not do a good job representing Dr. al Haddad in a holistic manner. However, a few minutes after making my entry, my article was replaced again by the previous article.
I did my best to keep my article factual and avoid any sort of bias in my article, therefore I don't understand why it has been rejected. Can you kindly assist me?
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbsarKazmi ( talk • contribs) 06:04, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Haitham al-Haddad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:24, 28 October 2017 (UTC)