Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch
I am nominating this article for GAR for failure of 2a. As I looked through the article, I saw that some of the sections are unreferenced, with the Sales section having a {{ Refimprove}} tag on it. GamerPro64 ( talk) 21:39, 29 November 2010 (UTC) reply

• Fully support de-listing it. I've just read the original pass report, to say that its brief would be an understatement of the highest magnitude. It wasn't suitable for a Pass then, and it hasn't got any better over the intervening years. I thought it had already been de-listed, if I had spotted that it hadn't, I would have nominated it myself. - X201 ( talk) 22:35, 29 November 2010 (UTC) reply
• Delist per mx issues needed. Lots of short, choppy paragraphs, little-to-no content on GTA1 and GTA2, lack of/weak sourcing in multiple sections. -- Teancum ( talk) 15:53, 6 December 2010 (UTC) reply

• With a week going by and there have been no significant changes to the article, I will close the GAR as Delist. GamerPro64 ( talk) 02:31, 7 December 2010 (UTC) reply