This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Alexissmith22.
Hi! SuggestBot got me here. I am not at all knowledgeable on the Gogo Falls, but a brief check at google has revealed, that the site is primarily a waterfall. The archaeological site should either be sectioned or have another article. All the Best
Wikirictor (
talk) 11:43, 3 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Hi Wikirictor. It doesn't look this should be about a waterfall. The Mapcarta link is actually away from the river and seems to have been misclassified as a waterfall. The falls themselves seem to no longer exist, given that a dam has been built at that location. The falls are only significant because they have given their name to the archaeological site (and the dam) --
Josephguillaume (
talk) 15:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Hi! Ok, i see. Thank you for your help. I noticed the articles on the dam, but i thought they are still in the planning phase .Maybe i should read a bit more first. All the best
Wikirictor (
talk) 15:18, 4 December 2016 (UTC)reply
I am going to make another infobox - for an archaeological site.
Wikirictor (
talk) 15:22, 4 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Thanks! The dam was built in 1956 and it seems disturbance due to building was part of the reason the archaeological site was identified. It appears there's no page for the dam itself, perhaps because it isn't sufficiently significant. I'm editing the
Gucha River page to mention it there. --
Josephguillaume (
talk) 15:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)reply