This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all
Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please
join the project, or contribute to the
project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
I will take this one, comments to follow in next few days.
Zawed (
talk) 03:06, 4 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Infobox
The stated draft is inconsistent with what is stated in the Design and description section.
Armament: refers to 1 twin 15cm gun as well as two singles for four guns total, but Design and description section says these four guns were all single mounts.
A commander is listed here but not mentioned in text.
Modifications
"No. 3 gun was also removed to make room for additional AA guns under the 1944 Barbara program": The use of "also" to me implies this was done at the same time as the mid-1942 refit but then this is inconsistent with the reference to the "1944 Barbara program". Perhaps context is required for the Barbara program as well. I assume that it is something to do with an increasing focus on protection from aircraft attacks.
Anti-convoy operations
While I appreciate some context is required to explain why the Z25 was doing what she was doing, I felt in a couple of places there was too much details on what other ships were doing. You may want to trim this section a little.
Baltic operations
Probably need to drop in one reference to 1944 and 1945 in this section for sake of clarity.
French service
The infobox says she entered service in August 1946 but that isn't explicitly stated here.
Other stuff
Image tags check OK
No dab links
No dupe links
The one external link checks out OK
That's my initial review complete, will check back in a few days. Cheers,
Zawed (
talk) 20:47, 10 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Thanks for going over this so carefully. See if my changes are satisfactory.--
Sturmvogel 66 (
talk) 00:10, 11 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Looks good except for the commander not being mentioned in the text. Cheers,
Zawed (
talk) 08:57, 12 March 2018 (UTC)reply
I have two different sets of dates for when he was in command, and no easy way of determining which is correct, so I'd prefer not to have to choose one or the other in the main body.--
Sturmvogel 66 (
talk) 11:32, 12 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Fair enough.
Zawed (
talk) 08:50, 13 March 2018 (UTC)reply
GA review (see
here for what the criteria are, and
here for what they are not)