This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Friends of Science in Medicine article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Opened FSM talk page. DJFryzy ( talk) 06:09, August 25, 2013 (UTC)
It has been noted that several unidentified users have attempted to denigrate this article into a biased piece of propaganda. Please remain vigilant in maintaining this page. DJFryzy ( talk) 01:50, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
The 'critical review' in question [2] is written by a PhD candidate at the University of New England. I can see nothing to indicate that the University either endorsed the paper, nor played any part in its preparation. In my view then, it is improper to imply otherwise. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 03:53, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
This article is currently under review in its entirety for updates, accuracy, and most importantly neutrality. If anyone has anything to add or change, kindly leave a small note on the Talk page. Thanks. Onlydemi ( talk) 01:48, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Page has been updated. Onlydemi ( talk) 03:16, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Page update Boko78 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:53, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
I have tagged the follow content as unclear,
The response by the CEO of Chiropractors' Association of Australia, Andrew Macnamara claims that there is no evidence provided to back up these concerns, however there is some evidence from a 2007 systematic review published in Pediatrics which would back up FSM concerns.
The preceding sentences do not provide a clear explanation of "these concerns". Explication of "FSM concerns" is not presented. What concerns did FSM raise, which did Macnamara dismiss and which are supported by the article in Pediatrics? - - MrBill3 ( talk) 06:28, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Friends of Science in Medicine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)