A fact from Fortifications of Gibraltar appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 June 2013 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gibraltar, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gibraltar and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GibraltarWikipedia:WikiProject GibraltarTemplate:WikiProject GibraltarGibraltar articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Overseas Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
British Overseas Territories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British Overseas TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesBritish Overseas Territories articles
I'll review this article shortly.--
Tomobe03 (
talk) 18:19, 12 June 2013 (UTC)reply
No disambiguation links (no action required)
External links are in order (no action required)
There is a couple of duplicate links in the article which need be removed per
WP:OVERLINK. Those are: RML 17.72 inch gun and Southport Gates.
All image licences are fine, except the "Gibraltar from the North Bastion coloured.jpg" need have US PD tag added. It is obviously too old to be copyrighted, but please just add the PD tag.
Referencing seems to be in order (no action requried)
MOS:
Units of measurement should be spelled out in this type of article per
WP:UNIT (using abbr=off parameter in the {{convert}} templates.
Ellipses in the article are represented as three spaced dots, which is not recommended per
MOS:ELLIPSIS. The MOS recommends non-spaced dots, but this is not a dealbreaker at this (GA) level.
Single digit numbers should be spelled out per
WP:ORDINAL. In instance of ...only 3 m (9.8 ft) above sea level... where a {{convert}} template is normally used, it is possible to apply {{convert/spell }} template. When using the template, note that there is a space following "spell" and preceding the first parameter pipe.
Year ranges should be written according to
MOS:YEAR. For instance instead of ...(written around 1370–1)..., there should be ...(written around 1370–71)...
In It mounted twelve 32-pounder guns and ten eight-inch howitzers... there should be a {{convert/spell }} template for the eight-inch (using adj=on parameter instead of abbr=off). There are further similar examples in the sections covering the 19th and the 20th centuries
"pounder" is sometimes abbreviated to "pdr" and sometimes spelled out. Since only four of the abbreviations are grouped relatively closely I'd recommend expanding the abbreviations to full words per WP:UNIT as well as
MOS:ABBR. This would also achieve a consistent use of the pounder/pdr in the article.
According to
MOS:HYPHEN, a hanging hyphen should be used in ...including iron-cast 6, 12 and 18-pdrs... as ...including iron-cast 6-, 12- and...
Prose:
Perhaps it would be prudent to add (later renamed the South Mole) after the first mention of the New Mole, especially since the term South Mole is not introduced elsewhere and the article on the mole indicates that is its common name now.
Great article! There are very few things to mend - most of them having to do with conversion of units and a number of other MOS-related issues which should be simple to fix. Outstanding work!--
Tomobe03 (
talk) 12:52, 16 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Thanks Tomobe! I should be able to get through those later today.
Prioryman (
talk) 07:55, 18 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Sorry I took a bit longer than anticipated. It should all be done now.
Prioryman (
talk) 23:06, 19 June 2013 (UTC)reply
No problem. Added a few tweaks - all good to go.--
Tomobe03 (
talk) 11:13, 20 June 2013 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on
Fortifications of Gibraltar. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.