![]() | Forest Park Carousel has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 5, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Forest Park Carousel appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 21 January 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Forest Park Carousel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:32, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 23:45, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
5x expanded by Epicgenius ( talk). Self-nominated at 19:54, 6 January 2023 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
@
Epicgenius: Good article.
Onegreatjoke (
talk) 16:46, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Unexpectedlydian ( talk · contribs) 20:23, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
This looks like a fun one :) I'll be reviewing this using the table below. Comments to follow shortly!
Unexpectedlydian♯4
talk‽ 20:23, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Lead
Description Original carousel Current carousel
|
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
Lead sections Layout Words to watch
Fiction
List incorporation
|
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
|
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
Source check Due to the quantity of citations, I will mainly be checking citations that are used multiple times in the article. Landmarks Preservation Commission 2013, p. 3. National Park Service 2004, p. 3. Landmarks Preservation Commission 2013, p. 4.
Landmarks Preservation Commission 2013, p. 5.
Farrell, Paul (May 27, 1999).
Lubrano, Alfred (May 28, 1989). Holland, Beth (May 15, 1989).
Guberman, Ira D. (November 25, 1973). National Park Service 2004, p. 4. Landmarks Preservation Commission 2013, p. 6. Hanc, John (July 24, 2003). Wagner, Patricia (May 1, 1972). Hogwood, Ben (December 18, 2008). Colangelo, Lisa L. (May 24, 1989). Colangelo, Lisa L. (November 29, 2011).
|
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. |
|
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
|
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
|
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
|
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
|
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
|
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
|
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
|
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |