This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The use of " Scotland's national" in the first sentence does not seem quite right. Please see Strategic Rail Authority. The fact that ScotRail is in the brand name does not make the fanchise Scotland's national fanchise. And there are other service operators using lines in Scotland. Laurel Bush 13:04, 4 July 2005 (UTC)
It might be an idea to split the NEG ScotRail part of the article away from the First ScotRail bulk. They are separate companies so they should have their own pages. Our Phellap 12:34, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
The caption indicates that the train is approaching Cardonald Station. Looking at the trackwork, it not Cardonald Junction. Can anyone please identify?
Stewart 16:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Following the rebranding of the franchise, should this be linked with the ScotRail page with historical information on the brand and past franchises along with information on the company today. Discuss ( Jacqueline2008 ( talk) 14:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC))
personal opinion is that the line at the top of the old scotrail page is enough - maybe a similar line should be added to the top of this one directing people to the old one lordmwa ( talk) 15:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
agreed lordmwa ( talk) 13:52, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Something needs to be done to sort the names of the articles. When looking for the present-day company name, ScotRail, you first come to the page about the old company before being redirected via the link at the top of the page to First ScotRail, which is now an old name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.2.74.19 ( talk) 22:35, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
This is a former rail operator, the only link with ScotRail is the franchise, so it should not be merged. Danski454 ( talk) 17:03, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Also a single paragraph is not a substitute for a full article. Danski454 ( talk) 17:05, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
As noted in the section Merger with ScotRail, the service is now called "ScotRail" and not "First ScotRail". I propose that a new article is created titled "ScotRail (FirstGroup)" and the contents of this "First ScotRail" article are transfered to the new article. This article can then be set to automatically redirect to the new "ScotRail (FirstGroup)" article. This will also be useful in the future, because if someone else wins the next franchise, it will still be called ScotRail and so an article on the new franchise can simply be created as "ScotRail (New Operator)". -- Jolin ( talk) 12:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi railway buffs (or whatever you call them! )
I was just wondering, since the new ScotRail livery is going to be around for a long time, I was thinking that the logo should be converted to SVG.
-calvinps- ( talk) 23:33, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Since this section of the article has been market for clean-up I suggest that the performance information is trimmed to only show the following:
Last National Express figures First First Scotrail figures (for comparison) Current First Scotrail figures
I have tried to make this change before in order to clean-up the article but the changes have been reversed, if anyone has any objections to this then raise them here.
I won't charge the article unless people agree on how much information should be pruned out.
I agree that there is too much here at present. waltonkbbl ( talk) 18:31, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:Class 156 - DMU - (2).jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
| |
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 18:34, 22 May 2011 (UTC) |
I feel this article really benefits from a map - it had one but it was obliterated about 3 years ago because it had a simple spelling mistake. I have inserted a new map graphic now - if there are any errors, just drop me a line and I'll do my best to fix it, but it would preferable for it not to be deleted. Cnbrb ( talk) 12:58, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
This page needs a lot of work done to it, new ref:s
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on First ScotRail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/upload/pdf/rolling-c2-railperf-q3.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.snp.org/media-centre/news/2012/jun/%C2%A35-billion-investment-rail-improvement-planWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on First ScotRail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC)