As with most GA Reviewers, I tend to break each individual section down to compose the overall article's quality. This way, you will be able to edit specifically the parts where I feel there are problems. Imperat§ r(
Talk)15:51, 21 February 2009 (UTC)reply
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
B.
Reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
Overall decent article with just a few minor mistakes mentioned below. Good job!
Article Review
Lead
"Reviews of the book were mixed, some positive and others negative."
If the review is mixed, then of course it's going to have both positive and negative...
I see plenty of opportunity for Wikilinks on the second paragraph.
Two of the articles were singled out by several reviewers as being the exceptional. One, "America is not a Hamburger", discusses the US State Department's attempt to re-brand America's image overseas. The second, "The Brutal Calculus of Suffering", discusses media portrayals of war.
Should be moved to the Publication and reception section
The fences represent exclusion and barriers while the windows are opportunities for expressing alternative ideas.
Again, too specific; move down to one of the sections below.
Two chapters were singled out as being exceptionally well-done: Los Angeles Times article "America is not a Hamburger" describing the US State Department's attempt to re-brand the USA rather than describing the US State Department's belief that rising anti-Americanism was a misunderstanding rather than a reaction to American policy directions, and Klein's October 2001 speech at a journalism conference in Stockholm, "The Brutal Calculus of Suffering" contrasting the media depictions of American versus non-American deaths.
Reword and split up.
Eliminate the two red links
Several opportunities for Linkage within the first two paragraphs (Optional)
References
Overall, references are pretty good.
Try to eliminate the red links.
General references should be merged somehow. corrected
Like the clarity and abundancy.
Most of the references seem to be clear and accurate.