This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taylor Swift, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Taylor Swift on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Taylor SwiftWikipedia:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTemplate:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTaylor Swift articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Oppose As being your standard example of
WP:DIFFCAPS. "False god" is always in lowercase, therefore it can be distinguished by hatnotes.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 17:07, 18 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Support. Generally I'd agree that
WP:DIFFCAPS would make this kind of move unnecessary. However, given that God is so often capitalized, I'm not convinced that "False God" and "False god" are reliably distinguishable based solely on the cap — particularly when (as here) we're considering them in the context of a title. With the clarifier, this better meets our
WP:CRITERIA.
╠╣uw[
talk 13:53, 19 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Support, as mentioned above, God is usually uppercased so DIFFCAPS should be ignored (as pretty much always) because it doesn't take this standard uppercasing into account. Given that, coming upon the song when searching seems a bit surprising.
Randy Kryn (
talk) 12:54, 20 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Weak support its probably best to have a DAB at the base name though as the generic meaning may not be primary either. Crouch, Swale (
talk) 16:09, 20 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Support. Clearly needed for clarity reasons. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 12:56, 21 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
"Commercially "False God" peaked at number 56" → "Commercially, the song peaked at number 59"
List the full name of the ARIA Singles Chart
Mention that the certification was in Australia
"by its musical director" → "by the show's musical director" and mention the years of this performance and her tour
Mention Ryan Hurd's cover version
I also included James Bay if that's okay.
Gained (
talk) 16:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Background and release
The "love letter to love itself" quote is not mentioned by the source
"celebrity at the time" is not needed in the sentence since we know the media would be focused on her status and at the time is implied
Wouldn't the chart positions go better in a new para of reception, retitling to simply this word?
Personally, I think they fit better with "Background and release" and I believe it's too short to a new paragraph for it on "Critical reception". I also think that section is very tightly focused so adding info about chart performance would kinda make it a bit unfocused and forced.
Gained (
talk) 16:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The correct Australia position is number 59, not 56
Production and music
Audio sample looks good!
"in New York City, and" → "in New York City (NYC), and" per later instances appearing in the article
On hold until all of the issues are fixed; completed right on time! --
K. Peake 15:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Hey @
Kyle Peake! I have addressed all your points except those that I have comments above.
Gained (
talk) 16:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Gained Thank you and regarding the Refinery29 citations, change work to publisher and the 53 U.S. dates was added by accident from me. --
K. Peake 17:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply