This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
FLAC article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
The article mentions twice a typical rate of 50-60%, and later it says "FLAC achieves compression rates of 30–50% for most music." anoko_moonlight ( talk) 04:28, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
There is no indication in the article how the codec achieves its lossless compression. That's a major omission, I'd say. 83.104.249.240 ( talk) 21:14, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
I would like that article would list Processing Power demands on encoding FLAC, compared to other compression format like mp3.
I would like to know, do I save CPU and pay more in RAM (or whatever it is it is happening), when choosing to use FLAC as PulseAudio Home Network Broadcast Sink as compare to Mp3. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.187.193.217 ( talk) 15:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
The reference associated with
| latest release version = {{wikidata|property|reference|P348}}
in the first infobox is not displaying. The Wikidata itself looks reasonable. I'm not sure how this stuff works. Maybe someone can help. ~ Kvng ( talk) 15:37, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
This broke again at some point - I asked for help and eventually managed to fix it (the wikidata editor is... not the most user-friendly in the world). Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 16:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC)