![]() | Federal Communications Commission Open Internet Order (2010) was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Lihaas ( talk) 01:04, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: – Quadell ( talk) 17:49, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
I'm afraid this article does not pass our GA requirements. There are several reasons for this. It overuses lists, instead of using prose. It does not offer sufficient background, nor does it link to articles (like Federal Communications Commission) which could provide background. But most importantly, large sections of the prose has been plagiarized from http://www.protectingtaxpayers.org/index.php?blog&action=view&post_id=48
When all these problems have been resolved, I would recommend nominating this article for peer review, and then trying a GA nomination when that process is complete.
I was asked about possible plagiarism between this article and this political source. This duplication report shows most of the duplicated content. Essentially the background and details sections have the same wording, just made into lists. – Quadell ( talk) 14:46, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
I noticed that the source of the alleged plagiarism was posted on July 17th 2011. However, according to the history of this wikipedia article, this page was written in May. Therefore, it could not have plagiarized information from the website in question. I believe this is a relevant observation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John rb11 ( talk • contribs) 19:11, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on FCC Open Internet Order 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.cnbc.com/id/40766647/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
This article is the subject of an
educational assignment at Michigan State University supported by
WikiProject United States Public Policy and the
Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available
on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by
PrimeBOT (
talk) on 16:40, 2 January 2023 (UTC)