This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Asian / Japanese / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces: /  Asian military history task force Japanese military history task force World War II task force China: History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history (assessed as Low-importance).

I think this section be deleted. It's information is very specific, not directly related to the article's subject and covered more appropriately in the time line. -- Mckinlayr 06:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC) reply

I don't see whats wrong with the article but I didn't even read it. So what do I know? (but I guess I will agree with you if it makes you happy!) Ciscokid21 12:25 (Pacific), October 1st 2008

(blond moment) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ciscokid21 ( talk • contribs) 19:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC) reply

I understand what you mean now that I read the article and I tootally agree with you now

Ciscokid21 12:34 (Pacific), October 1st 2008

(not a blond moment)