This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Finance and
Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RetailingWikipedia:WikiProject RetailingTemplate:WikiProject RetailingRetailing articles
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 January 2020 and 23 April 2020. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Mpola017.
As a relative newbie editor, I don't feel like taking it upon myself to remove the template without some consultation. There's been a lot of editing on this topic since the template was put up a year+ ago. To me, the article does not read like an advertisement and references appear to be in keeping with protocol. While no doubt many feel there's "more to the story" -- I personally know people who believe "the truth" is far deeper and darker than has been revealed -- this article seems informative to the general encyclopedia-reader looking for information about the company. So...time to remove the template? I'd like to do it myself just for practice, but of course do not insist on that. --
Jhoughton1 (
talk) 14:47, 14 July 2020 (UTC)reply
It has been more than two years since this comment and dozens of edits later. To my eyes, this article doesn't read like an advertisement. I will be bold and remove it. If someone disagrees, please put it back and add your reasoning here. --
Replysixty (
talk) 20:56, 3 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Criticism
Hi, I’ve added the “criticism” section back to describe the issues around data collection and the name change. I’m open to renaming this section to something like Name Change Controversy? Also, if you are going to remove this section , this would be for the third time, at least be civil enough to post on this talk thread. It was discussed that the editing users were utilizing IP ranges from the corporate network (see edit history).
Patrick Fleischman (
talk) 11:22, 31 March 2023 (UTC)reply