This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Elvis Presley, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Elvis PresleyWikipedia:WikiProject Elvis PresleyTemplate:WikiProject Elvis PresleyElvis Presley articles
This article was
copy edited by
Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on July 5, 2021.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
Whoever noted that Charro didn't have a soundtrack release needs to do some homework, as the theme song was released on a single. Also several Presley films didn't have any sort of "soundtrack album" release. Several, including Flaming Star, were only represented by singles or EP discs.
68.146.81.123 (
talk) 18:01, 11 October 2009 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Elvis on Tour. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week.
Some Dude From North Carolina (
talk) 13:30, 6 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Comments
Runtime needs a source.
Let's go with the one on the home media version. The other numbers vary plenty.--GDuwenHoller! 18:49, 6 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Poster needs alt text and a caption.
Let me know what you think.--GDuwenHoller! 18:49, 6 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Not truly, I think I just been influenced by seeing it written that way in so many 70s publicity pictures (also for other movies). I just went ahead and removed all instances.--GDuwenHoller! 18:49, 6 July 2021 (UTC)reply
WorkingDone with the domestic. I wanted to point out that the reason that some reviews take several paragraphs is that those are the ones belonging to major newspapers. Writers like Vincent Canby (or the LA Times staff writers among others) had an immense reach through their nationally syndicated columns, which were reprinted by most newspapers. They were at the time pretty much considered authorities in film, and still to this day when books mention the reception of films, they focus mostly on their reviews.
That takes us to the next point: At the time, smaller newspapers used to pretty much re-print the same reviews via the news services of say The New York Times, Chicago Tribune, UPI, etc. I added to this article the original reviews, while the rest that I found were just the news wires republished. There are really no other reviews available.--GDuwenHoller! 20:43, 6 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Done I trimmed a good deal of the quotations, and I suppose that the ones I left in should be OK now. As I explained above, there is not much to be added that I can find rather than mirrors of the original news wires from major publications.--GDuwenHoller! 18:27, 7 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
MeegsC (
talk) 14:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)reply
... that the 1972 documentary Elvis on Tour became the only film starring
Elvis Presley to win an award? p. 190; Jeansonn, Glenn; Luhrssen, David; Sokolovic, Dan (2011). Elvis Presley, Reluctant Rebel: His Life and Our Times: His Life and Our Times. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-0-313-35905-7. (
or this alternative not included in the article)
ALT1:... that the 1972 documentary Elvis on Tour was edited by
Martin Scorsese? p. 257; Baker, Aron (2021). A Companion to Martin Scorses. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-119-68562-3.
Improved to Good Article status by
GDuwen (
talk). Self-nominated at 20:50, 13 July 2021 (UTC).reply
DYK requirements check out as a new GA, no close paraphrasing was found, QPQ done. Hook is cited to an offline source so AGF, the issue at the moment is that the hook says it was the only Elvis-starring film to win an award, whereas the article says it was his only acting credit to win an award. Either the hook or the article needs to be revised.
Narutolovehinata5 (
talk ·
contributions) 01:09, 14 July 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Narutolovehinata5: Thanks for pointing that out, I've just modified the article. I think it is more appropriate to refer to it as "starring" rather than "only acting credit", as it is a documentary.--GDuwenHoller! 14:51, 14 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Thanks, however the article now says "It became the only film starring to earn an award" which doesn't sound grammatically correct.
Narutolovehinata5 (
talk ·
contributions) 02:50, 15 July 2021 (UTC)reply
A new box set of four CDs from four of these concerts plus the original movie on DVD is to be released in January 2023.
Bubba73You talkin' to me? 02:01, 16 December 2022 (UTC)reply