This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ek Tha Tiger received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
The language used is really bad, full of grammatic mistakes and to top it, the page is locked! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.167.73 ( talk) 10:05, 15 November 2012 (UTC) Why are almost all new Bollywood releases being locked? I have not seen this behavior for Hollywood films? This goes against the philosophy of Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.192.66.17 ( talk) 11:39, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello,If anybody watched and remind the movie completely then plz try to expand the plot. Zion1985 ( talk) 20:35, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
What is difference among thriller and we are family action? Are these not the same terms. -- Omer123hussain ( talk) 22:02, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Ek Tha Tiger comics were launched to promote the film. http://www.indicine.com/movies/bollywood/ek-tha-tiger-comics/ Please add this in the marketing section. Thanks. 176.251.32.74 ( talk) 15:35, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi! I think that the music critical reception section would need to be re-written. Also more reviews could be added. Thanks. 111.92.95.183 16:44, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Suggestions please. For reviews, we only take into account reliable sources. Secret of success ( talk) 11:19, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply. Hope this helps. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] Thanks. 111.92.95.183 ( talk) 18:41, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Glamsham, Koimoi, Bollyspice, Bollywood Life and Indicine are not reliable sources. The rest have been added. Thanks. Secret of success ( talk) 14:31, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
At least Glamsham, Koimoi and Indicine are reliable sources, add it. Believe me. 111.92.95.183 ( talk) 16:51, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Um, its not a question of believing you or not. If you feel that they are reliable sources, please explain how they pass the reliable sources guideline (mostly by showing their mention in other reputed sources like newspapers and magazines). Secret of success ( talk) 15:11, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
OK! 111.92.95.183 ( talk) 10:22, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
please edit the article and delete the unnecessary changes done by sanjayshivaji (user) on 14th of august as it is of harm to the reputation of the enterprise herein related and discussed.
117.219.113.254 ( talk) 08:27, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Done. Torreslfchero ( talk) 08:44, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The information provided in the page is correct , but some user has given hate comments on the film, and they have prefixed that hate statement in every paragraph, request you to please remove that BOLD hate statement about the movie Iwadia03 ( talk) 08:33, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Done. I have reverted some unnecessary changes made by some users. Torreslfchero ( talk) 08:45, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
I have added 4 times music cover but the admin is removing it please don't remove it I have added official cover it does not fails wikipedia's non-free criteria. Kskhh ( talk) 17:27, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Taran Adarsh is a world re-known sold out critic. Don't add his reviews.-- almightyvegeta ( talk) 20:43, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Stop Messing with the format. Tranny Adarsh's reviews will not feature on Wiki.-- almightyvegeta ( talk) 11:23, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
The critic rating of Ek tha Tiger on reviewgang website
here * [8] is 6/10 then what is more appropriate "mixed" or "positive to mixed" in critical reception section. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 22:07, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
The phrase "a full-blown Hindi film, with desh prem, farz and mohabbat as part of the recipe" under the section Release and Reception > Critical Reception > India has links from "desh prem", "farz" and "mohabbat" to 3 different movies, whereas I think the reviewer meant the three emotions. Please check this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RamakrishnanRS ( talk • contribs) 15:50, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
please change ek tha tiger 18 days total Rs 176.50 crore to 192.58 crore for 19 days,because its 16 days total was Rs 184.83 crore according to The Economic times,one of the most reliable source, link-1 has also been given below. and it further added 7.75 crore on its third weekend taking its total to Rs 192.58 crore in 19 days.[link-2] link 1 [9] link 2 [10]
thank you Ziarehman30 ( talk) 20:25, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
the domestic gross is 200 crore so i want the editer to change it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaik66 ( talk • contribs) 20:27, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Update the Box Office collections, It has crosses 190 mark. Sexy Lara ( talk) 11:01, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
sir as per taran adarsh(twitter account) domestic boxoffice collections of ek tha tiger is Rs 199.7 crore ,please update it, Thank You
sir as per taran adarsh(twitter account) domestic boxoffice collections of ek tha tiger is Rs 199.7 crore ,please update it, Thank You
The issue is that Box Office India failed to declare the film's success (e.g all time blockbuster) and hence provided incomplete information. Every other trade source on the web accepts this film as an all time blockbuster.
I would therefore like to request that bollywood hungama, represented by the notable trade analyst and film critic Taran Adarsh, should be used as a secondary source in the future, in cases like this where Box Office India fails to give complete information.
If this is the case then then by all considerations it can be safely called an all time blockbuster. However, Box Office India didn't say this when EVERY other source did.
Hence, it would be sufficient to use another source to cite the claim that it is an atbb, right?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Factual Proof ( talk • contribs) 13:40, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Please add information to the article that the film netted in India minimum of 10 crore for 9 days. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.193.32.58 ( talk) 15:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
I am shocked to see that Wikipedia provides figures pertaining to bollywood box office business from www.boxofficeindia.com which is not genuine. There are other releant sources like bollywoodhungama.com, addatoday.com, koimoi.com which provide accurate figures of box office. I request you to remove restriction from movie "Ek Tha Tiger" so that I can make changes to its collection which is about INR.198cr nut Wikipedia mentions it as INR 186 cr (Source boxofficeindia.com which is not accurate at all). Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afzal57hhh ( talk • contribs) 13:58, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
{{
edit semi protected}}
. If your request is ok then it will added by some other users.
Torreslfchero (
talk) 09:10, 5 December 2012 (UTC)There are a lot of doubts in wikipedian sites about the total nett of this film. in some places it is 178 in some places it is 185 and some says 198 crore. As i can't access worldwide sites so i request someone plz update the accurte business of Ek Tha Tiger in India separately. ( Dr. Shahid Alam)( Talk to Me) 18:15, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
ett — Preceding unsigned comment added by 3apkgklak ( talk • contribs) 19:36, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Ek Tha Tiger. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 17:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 15 external links on Ek Tha Tiger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.glamsham.com/movies/scoops/12/jun/26-news-sn-katrinas-ek-tha-tiger-releases-on-aug-051213.asp{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://boxofficeindia.com/boxnewsdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=4869&nCat={{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.deccanchronicle.com/node/69522{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://theghantas.com/vote/login.phpWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:41, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 11 external links on Ek Tha Tiger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:19, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
I was looking for (but didn't find) Irish reviews of this film. Instead I found an article from 2019 saying that this film did result in increased Indian tourist interest in Dublin. [11] "London-based tourism buyer, Bhakti Parmar, who works for corporate travel firm Europe Inbound, specialises in bringing the staff of Indian corporates to the region on incentive trips." [...] " Ireland used to be broadly off the agenda, but recently, she said, there has been an upsurge in interest from Indian clients." [...] "Indian visitors don’t really want to see the Book of Kells. They want to see where the scene was filmed," Parmar said.
Not sure if it is worth including it in the reception section but I mention it here FWIW. -- 109.76.128.3 ( talk) 01:34, 11 November 2023 (UTC)