![]() | Eega is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 6, 2017. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Eega movie 2012.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 15:40, 19 September 2011 (UTC) |
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Eega-First-Look-Poster.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Eega-First-Look-Poster.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 09:40, 1 April 2012 (UTC) |
Rajamouli’s statement about Megastar Chiru’s film !! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaianu ( talk • contribs) 05:25, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Tollyhub.com gave 4/5 star rating for Eega - Source : http://tollyhub.com/eega-movie-review/
Tollyhub.com article on eega records and collections. Source : http://tollyhub.com/eega-collections-records/
Ashezreinz ( talk) 15:53, 14 July 2012 (UTC) Eega first week collections — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indiarocks08 ( talk • contribs) 00:56, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template. It's not clear to me that Tollyhub.com meets Wikipedia guidelines for
external links or
notability. I'd prefer to see clear consensus to include it before adding.
Rivertorch (
talk) 04:23, 15 July 2012 (UTC)21 DAYS BOX OFFICE COLLECTIONS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.203.104.191 ( talk) 04:43, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
I strongly believe that Plot section is far too detailed. Also it should be edited to make sure climax is not revealed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vikalp74 ( talk • contribs) 08:38, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
The movie has crossed it's 100 days also and revealing the climax is not wrong. If the movie is released just a few days ago then the plot shouln't be added. Raghusri ( talk) 15:49, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
User:Murrallli, please explain your position. Here is the previous discussion of this topic. Talk:Naan Ee. Also kindly explain why you remove any reference directed to South Indian cinema. Thanks!-- Dravidian Hero 19:28, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:NFCC#3a doesn't apply here as this article covers two separate films, which have been merged to avoid duplicate content in separate film articles. So 1 film = 1 poster = minimal usage.-- Dravidian Hero 10:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Your opinion is right Mr. Dravidian :), but the two posters containing image file was deleted by admin. See here : Merged file. Regards, Raghusri ( talk) 07:49, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
then why dont u both split the two articles eega and naani???? why on earth u merge the articles and fight for image???
Murrallli (
talk) 14:08, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Eega. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:48, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 34 external links on Eega. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:45, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/Eega -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:02, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
I've added an {{ as of?}} tag to ...
Its Hindi-dubbed version, Makkhi, which was released on 12 October 2012, was not as commercially successful as of? as the others.
... because as comparative 'commercial success' is subject to change* some clarification seems warranted ( MOS:EPHEMERAL). Perhaps the passage might be better phrased something like ...
Additionally, a Hindi-dubbed version titled Makkhi was released on 12 October 2012; according to [ _____ ] as of [ _____ ] it had not performed as well commercially as the others.
... or ...
Additionally a Hindi-dubbed version titled Makkhi was released on 12 October 2012; as of [ _____ ] it had not performed as well commercially as the others.[reference link]
If details to fill-in-the-blanks aren't presently readily available perhaps the existence of the Hindi-dub should simply be noted on its own, perhaps a so ...
Additionally a Hindi-dubbed version titled Makkhi was released on 12 October 2012.
*[Personally, I came across Makkhi subtitled in English on US Netflix (which presently opens it up to a fairly large Anglosphere audience) while browsing the Netflix cult films category. I loved it and searched for info about it soon after watching.]
-- 75.188.199.98 ( talk) 16:28, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Makkhi ’s average run in theatres" (bold added for emphasis), and goes on to note that, "
it had a great run on satellite TV". Please, let's try to avoid hyperbole going forward as we're aspiring to produce encyclopedic text.
... Eega was one of the highest-grossing Telugu films of the year, earning more than ₹1.25 billion ( US$16.87 million). Its Hindi-dubbed version, Makkhi, was released on 12 October 2012. Rajamouli felt that Makkhi hadn't been presented as well as other versions and thus, as of June 2015, had not achieved equivalent commercial success. [1] ...
References
I felt Makkhi was not presented well even though it had a great run on satellite TV. Considering the movie had done well in other parts of the country, I felt it odd that it didn't do well in Hindi. I realised that it is not just enough to have good content. Unless it is presented well, the audience won't come.—S.S. Rajamouli
While there is consensus to include a range for the film's budget, the actual range is kind of dicey. Rajamouli mentioned in various occasions a budget of ₹30 cr and ₹30–35 cr. And independent estimates have the budget at ₹40 cr.
Actor Nani mentioned ₹25 cr as the budget. But Nani is not the primary lead of the film, is not involved in the production of the film and was only an upcoming actor at the time to have a greater say in the production. So what he heard might not be accurate or the budget might have increased afterwards as the film was extensively reshot.
On the other hand, Rajamouli is the director and is also involved in the production through Vaarahi in which he is a partner. In view of all this, I think the budget range can be changed to ₹30–40 crore to accommodate both official figures from the director and independent estimates while not considering Nani's estimate which might not be the final figure or accurate. Let me know your thoughts. Reo kwon ( talk) 09:20, 29 August 2022 (UTC)