This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Economy of Turkey article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 210 days

This   level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Turkey Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Economics Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Business Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Trade Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

At the moment they range from 2017 to 2023. I think it would make more sense to have them all 2022. What do you think? Chidgk1 ( talk) 11:54, 27 April 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Omnibenevolence: @ Metuboy:I think they should all be for 2023 now - your thoughts? Chidgk1 ( talk) 13:52, 2 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello @ Metuboy

Good to see you and @ Omnibenevolence improving this article. But I am curious to know why you removed the excerpt from poverty in Turkey. I think using an excerpt here makes the articles easier to keep up to date in future Chidgk1 ( talk) 13:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC) reply

I removed it since the excerpt was extracting only a single line of text and a large image. And the image was overlaping with the topic below. Actually we can keep the excerpt. I already remove the image from the poverty article. Since the text of the image was not mentioned in the article itself. It was not a good practise. Metuboy ( talk) 14:28, 2 January 2024 (UTC) reply

You are free to use the excerpt back again. If you think it was a better practise. Metuboy ( talk) 14:36, 2 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Yes even though it is only one sentence at the moment I hope in future you or someone else might be interested in expanding the lead of Poverty in Turkey Chidgk1 ( talk) 15:00, 2 January 2024 (UTC) reply

I think all the info in the infoxbox should be for 2023 because that would be up to date but not speculative

What do you think? Chidgk1 ( talk) 13:52, 5 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Yes I agree per WP: crystal Shadow4dark ( talk) 18:43, 5 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Ha ha thanks but I am not a Geordie Chidgk1 ( talk) 19:04, 5 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Forecasts aren't meant to be speculative,they reflect the upcoming agenda not guesses 212.253.193.142 ( talk) 00:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC) reply

But some of the figures in the infobox are still at 2017 and 2018 - surely those should be updated to 2022 or 2023 rather than continually changing the 2023 figures to different months in 2024? Chidgk1 ( talk) 15:07, 19 January 2024 (UTC) reply

This is getting silly - how can we know the average monthly salary for 2024 when it is only January - I give up Chidgk1 ( talk) 13:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Often they have press releases in English as well as Turkish - for example for the unemployment rate. Using these pages will make it easier for readers to check cites Chidgk1 ( talk) 16:36, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply

@ 88.233.153.183: and anyone else interested Chidgk1 ( talk) 09:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC) reply

I guess its because all countries has been edited in wiki according to imf figures it keeps fresh and reliable data Pirteappp ( talk) 12:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC) reply

The lead of this article says ‘Turkey's nominal GDP peaked at $1.340 trillion in 2024, and its nominal GDP per capita peaked at $15,368 in the same year.’ but if I wrote something similar in the peak coal article I am sure my change would be reverted by someone saying that a peak year must have at least one lower level year after it.

What do you think ‘peaked’ means? Chidgk1 ( talk) 09:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC) reply

I think the words you are looking for are "all-time high". So it would be "Turkey's nominal GDP reached an all-time high of $1.340 trillion in 2024..." KREOH ( talk) 01:18, 23 January 2024 (UTC) reply

IMF data has been updated and It seems the current data page hasn't been updated Pirteappp ( talk) 12:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I have observed that someone has changed trade partner values and combined individual trade partners into a single EU data. This is misleading and unnecessarily ideological. I suggest it to be reverted. Thank you. 212.253.113.156 ( talk) 13:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC) reply