This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Toto album?
I think this is more of a soundtrack and does not belong in the Toto discography —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
71.166.137.32 (
talk) 16:41, 1 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Agreed thoroughly - this wasn't entirely their work, and the cover of the album doesn't credit them as sole artist. I'm going to go ahead and remove it from the discography sidebar, and put it into a separate section in the main discography article. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Carefree Highway (
talk •
contribs) 04:42, 2 January 2009 (UTC)reply
The origin of the Dune main theme
I was watching the "Stockholm Syndrome" segment on the Daily Show for April 21-22 and they played a song in the opening that has nearly (if not) the same melody as the Dune Main Theme. However, based on the arrangement I am pretty sure it's not from the movie. Does anyone know what this song is? I'm pretty sure Toto used it to derive the Main Theme.
This isn't that uncommon for movie soundtracks, see Willow and Robert Schumann's 3rd Symphony.
--
122.26.114.136 (
talk) 01:57, 26 April 2009 (UTC)reply
I'm not sure about this, but isn't the theme from Dune "Terminal frost" by Pink Floyd (ot the other way around)? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
81.231.153.47 (
talk) 02:04, 25 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Assessment comment
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Dune (1984 soundtrack)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following
several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Article requirements:
Y All the start class criteria Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details Y At least one section of prose (excluding the lead section) Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs N A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians Y Categorisation at least by artist and year Y A casual reader should learn something about the album.
Last edited at 06:15, 11 May 2008 (UTC).
Substituted at 13:54, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 4 March 2024
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to
Dune (1984 soundtrack). There is a consensus to move to the alternate proposed title.
– robertsky (
talk) 02:58, 12 March 2024 (UTC)reply
There are such things as
WP:PRIMARYREDIRECTs, so the subtopic in a different article can be a primary topic for the particular term, or can dispute the primarity of an article. Thus, the 1984 soundtrack is not undisputibly the primary topic, there being a reasonable and likely chance the 2021 soundtracks are more primary. And the 2021 film was a hit, while the 1984 film was a flop. --
65.92.247.66 (
talk) 06:06, 6 March 2024 (UTC)reply
WP:ALBUMDAB does in fact automatically make an article primary ahead of a redirect. "Unless more than one article about albums of the same name exist, there is no need to disambiguate any further." This is longstanding consensus, and I don't see a need to deviate from it here.
162 etc. (
talk) 16:17, 6 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose They're ... both non-NATURAL?
InfiniteNexus (
talk) 18:59, 5 March 2024 (UTC)reply
They both use the undertitle... "Original Motion Picture Soundtrack" undertitle and "Original Soundtrack Recording" undertitle as shown in their respective album covers... so seems to fit NATURALDAB -- though we could convert the parentheses into colons
Dune: Original Soundtrack Recording and
Dune: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack -- I was suggesting a title to match the existing bluelink for the 2021 album --
65.92.247.66 (
talk) 06:06, 6 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The point is, it's already parenthetically disambiguated, so we wouldn't want to make the disambiguation even longer per
WP:CONCISE.
InfiniteNexus (
talk) 06:36, 6 March 2024 (UTC)reply
162, please do not get so caught up with procedure and formality. If enough participants agree that the other article should be moved as well, someone will add that article to the nomination. There is no need to announce that we can't discuss moving another page here.
InfiniteNexus (
talk) 20:57, 9 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.